On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:32 PM, timeless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Marcos Caceres
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> APIs are identified as resources via URIs. For
>> example:
>>
>>
>>
>>> src="http://g
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Under the current spec the operator must check each individual PHP
script in the part of the site that is shared to make sure that none of
them use $_SESSION, $_COOKIE, $HTTP_SESSION_VARS, $_ENV['HTTP_COOKIE'],
HttpRequest::getCookies
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Under the current spec the operator must check each individual PHP
script in the part of the site that is shared to make sure that none of
them use $_SESSION, $_COOKIE, $HTTP_SESSION_VARS, $_ENV['HTTP_COOKIE'],
HttpRequest::getCookies
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> Under the current spec the operator must check each individual PHP
> script in the part of the site that is shared to make sure that none of
> them use $_SESSION, $_COOKIE, $HTTP_SESSION_VARS, $_ENV['HTTP_COOKIE'],
> HttpRequest::getCookies(), any of
Sunava Dutta wrote:
Hey Jonas, rather than seem to disappear I wanted to set expectations. (We're
not ignoring you and don't want to come off like that) Zhenbin and I have been
busy so far on XHR and a few other issues. We'll be starting replying to this
Monday next week.
Sounds good.
Btw
Hey Jonas, rather than seem to disappear I wanted to set expectations. (We're
not ignoring you and don't want to come off like that) Zhenbin and I have been
busy so far on XHR and a few other issues. We'll be starting replying to this
Monday next week.
Btw, thanks for the statement:
"> Looking
Adding the editor to take the next steps. Thanks,
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhenbin Xu
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:47 PM
> To: Jonas Sicking
> Cc: Sunava Dutta; Ian Hickson; public-webapps@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX
> SWAT Team
> Subject: RE: RE: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potent
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:32 PM
> To: Zhenbin Xu
> Cc: Sunava Dutta; Ian Hickson; public-webapps@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX
> SWAT Team
> Subject: Re: RE: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in X
Zhenbin Xu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:05 PM
To: Zhenbin Xu
Cc: Sunava Dutta; Ian Hickson; public-webapps@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX
SWAT Team
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC
Test Suite
Zhe
Thanks. I think we will consider the tracker for future threads and also use
the F2F. Meanwhile, Zhenbin has answered Jonas.
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Schepers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:57 PM
> To: Sunava Dutta
> Cc: Jonas Sicking; Zhenbin Xu; Ian
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:05 PM
> To: Zhenbin Xu
> Cc: Sunava Dutta; Ian Hickson; public-webapps@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX
> SWAT Team
> Subject: Re: RE: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in
Zhenbin Xu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 1:19 PM
To: Zhenbin Xu
Cc: Sunava Dutta; Ian Hickson; public-webapps@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX
SWAT Team
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC
Test Suite
Zhe
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 1:19 PM
> To: Zhenbin Xu
> Cc: Sunava Dutta; Ian Hickson; public-webapps@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX
> SWAT Team
> Subject: Re: RE: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in
Zhenbin Xu wrote:
Jonas, I don't feel you have summarized our position properly. We
said it should be exception but we are willing to accommodate other
implementations for the spec to have a leeway there and avoiding
protracted discussions.
I assume you mean by the "null or exception" proposa
As a general rule, I'm in favor of that - or at least some way of forking the
discussions and only requiring individuals to be involved in what they're
interested/expert in.
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 4:06 PM
To: Sunav
Jonas, I don't feel you have summarized our position properly. We said it
should be exception but we are willing to accommodate other implementations for
the spec to have a leeway there and avoiding protracted discussions. We have
absolutely no problem for the spec to clearly state that except
Can anyone really ever mention things that are member confidential on
IRC? We have no control over who else is in the room and possibly logging.
/ Jonas
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Hi Anne,
this raises a couple of issues - the obvious one being how we deal with
meetings which include in
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
That is, your solution only works so long as the site doesn't ever opt in to
cookies. Which seems uncommon.
This is not true. You can opt in to cookies on just a subset of the URIs
where you opt in to Access-Control with my proposal.
Hi Anne,
this raises a couple of issues - the obvious one being how we deal with
meetings which include information that is member-only, and also whether
the logger has some facility for saying something that doesn't go into the
record, as the W3C log bots do.
Hopefully we will clear thi
All,
On Jun 17, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:45:04 +0900, Web Applications Working Group
Issue Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF
[All Products]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/tr
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Marcos Caceres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> APIs are identified as resources via URIs. For
> example:
>
>
>
> src="http://gps.w3.org/api.jar";
This worries me. see clsid: and the problems of activex for
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:25:04 +0200, timeless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Arve Bersvendsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The security policy proposed by Opera (and mostly implemented already)
allows you to XHR any content stored within the package archive itself,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Arve Bersvendsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The security policy proposed by Opera (and mostly implemented already)
> allows you to XHR any content stored within the package archive itself, just
> as it would allow you to include the contents of a package through
Hi,
What follows is an *extremely rough* strawman proposal to address
"R30. Device Specific APIs and Services", of the widget requirements
document. This proposal is intended for discussion and is deliberately
thin on technical details.
Requirement 30 of the Widgets requirements document is as fo
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:11:42 +0200, Marcos Caceres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Marcos Caceres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To which Timeless replied...
Yes, that is possible (using XHR to load the config from within the
package), but then you have to walk an
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Marcos Caceres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To which Timeless replied...
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: timeless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
> To: Marcos Caceres <[EMAIL PROT
To which Timeless replied...
-- Forwarded message --
From: timeless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
To: Marcos Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(you didn't reply to the list)
On 6/18/08, Marcos Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I accidentally sent this discussion to Timeless without including the list
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marcos Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:02 PM, timel
28 matches
Mail list logo
