Re: ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]

2008-07-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
Jonas Sicking: > I think this was a feature request to make it possible for the code > firing the custom event to specify whether the event should be > retargetted or stopped. The XBL spec can't specify all possible custom > events of course, so it does make sense, however I would ask what t

Re: ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]

2008-07-23 Thread Jonas Sicking
Cameron McCormack wrote: XBL2 currently says: The action taken (retarget vs. stop) is specific to the event type. In general, UI events must be retargeted and mutation events must be stopped. Exceptions to the rule are noted below. The goal of this retargeting or stopping is to stop out

Re: ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]

2008-07-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker: > ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 > Events] … > I'd like to make another suggestion about DOM 3 custom events; this time > a great simplification. This simplification to CustomEvent is already in the spec:

Not able to attend the call today...

2008-07-23 Thread Travis Leithead
Sorry I have a family commitment at this time today and won't be able to make it.

ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]

2008-07-23 Thread Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/42 Raised by: Doug Schepers On product: DOM3 Events >From Cameron McCormack in >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Oct/0005.html: I'd like to make anothe

ISSUE-41 (New Non-NS Event Methods): Should all event methods have namespaced and non-namespaced equivalents?

2008-07-23 Thread Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-41 (New Non-NS Event Methods): Should all event methods have namespaced and non-namespaced equivalents? http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/41 Raised by: Doug Schepers On product: >From Olli Pettay in >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0260.html: [[

[D3E] Few comments

2008-07-23 Thread Olli Pettay
Hi all, few comments to the current editor's draft. IMO CustomEvent should have also initCustomEvent(), not only initCustomEventNS(). Having only initCustomEventNS doesn't prevent anyone to create events with null namespace and it is just annoying if initCustomEvent isn't there. Similar with M

Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 23 July 2008 (Today!!)

2008-07-23 Thread Doug Schepers
Hi WebApps Fans- This is a reminder that we will have a DOM 3 Events telcon today, 23 July. Please reply to public-webapps@w3.org to express regrets if you cannot attend. The regular time is Wednesdays, 18:30-20:00 UTC. See the DOM3 Events wiki page for timezones adjustments. [1] The ten