Hi Bryan, MWBP WG,
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Sullivan, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Art,
The MWBP WG consolidated comments are attached as a HTML document.
General comments:
Somewhere, perhaps in section 4.2, there should something about how
resources (media etc) need to be
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Travis Leithead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate a little friendly competition and bantering,
Who are you competing with?
but I don't think it's appropriate or in the best interest of cooperation for
such personal feelings of animosity to be disclosed
Hi Garrett.
Travis Leithead:
My question, once again, is whether WebIDL will define exactly how
to translate the behavior of operators like delete into the
JavaScript language binding for DOM objects.
Garrett Smith:
That isn't a question. This is: Why does WebIDL need to define how
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 14, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
Document interface is an interface. An interface does not have defined
implementation; it is merely a contract. IDL is for Interface
Definition.
The fact that
Hi Bryan, MWBP WG,
FYI, we discussed the MWBP input in last nights teleconf:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0417.html
In summary, although I had included most of the requirements proposed
by the MWBP WG in the Requirements document, the WebApps WG members
overrode
