On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Arun Ranganathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maciej,
>
>> My first question would be:
>>
>> Why did you ignore Apple's proposal to start with a minimal common
>> interface (which most people seemed to like) and instead wrote a draft that
>> is the union of all
Maciej,
My first question would be:
Why did you ignore Apple's proposal to start with a minimal common
interface (which most people seemed to like) and instead wrote a draft
that is the union of all things in Robin's original spec, all things
that Mozilla happened to implement, and a bunch
On Oct 15, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
The Call for Consensus regarding a new WD of the FileUpload
specification notwithstanding, I think it prudent to *not* publish a
WD till members of the WG get a chance to comment on my editor's
draft, and till the potential F2F at the
The Call for Consensus regarding a new WD of the FileUpload
specification notwithstanding, I think it prudent to *not* publish a WD
till members of the WG get a chance to comment on my editor's draft, and
till the potential F2F at the upcoming TPAC has taken place.
I'd thus like commentary o
Hi WebApps Fans-
I have to cancel this week's telcon, and TPAC is next week. DOM3 Events
telcons will resume in November.
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
Use cases:
The use cases described below are based on applications accessing
their data through Web feeds and their linked resources in conjunction
with the semantics of GET, PUT, POST, and DELETE defined in the
AtomPub protocol. The feeds considered here are in the Atom format.
However,
Below is the draft agenda for the October 16 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is
encouraged.
Logistics:
Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane
Duration = 60 minutes
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, confe
Hi Addison and i18n-WG members,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Phillips, Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just now reviewed all of your responses again and am satisfied (within
> the limits of what you can reasonably do, especially wrt the Zip limitations
> :-)). Thanks for