Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009

Hi Boris, On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Marcos Caceres wrote: >> >> Ok, I've removed it. This may cause implementations to override files >> on systems that don't support case insensitive file names. This should >> not be a real problem, as most file system won't let yo

Re: [widgets] P&C 1.0 Last Call WD: localization comments

Hi Jere, On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Jere Kapyaho wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > for the LC disposition of comments: > > I checked against the latest Editor's Draft (as found at > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/); all the concerns I raised below have > been addressed. Thank you. Great! thank

Publishing Element Traversal errata

Hello WG. Since there were no objections to the idea of publishing an erratum to solve the issue with the Element Traversal binding licensing, I’ve created a candidate errata page: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ElementTraversal/REC-ElementTraversal-20081222-errata.html along with two zip fil

[widgets] Minutes from 22 January 2009 Voice Conference

The minutes from the January 22 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 29 January 2009 (th

[widgets] APIs and Events 1.0 draft comments

Hi Arve, I looked briefly at the Widgets 1.0 APIs and Events spec, Working Draft 22 January 2009. Here are a couple of comments. 1.2 Terms and definitions The definition of "widget context" is maybe a little bit too recursive to be useful... 2.2 last sentence: "... meaning such an implementati

Re: [widgets] P&C 1.0 Last Call WD: localization comments

Hi Marcos, for the LC disposition of comments: I checked against the latest Editor's Draft (as found at http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/); all the concerns I raised below have been addressed. Thank you. Two *very* minor points about the example in section 6.5: - "The config.xml file at the

Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009

Marcos Caceres wrote: Ok, I've removed it. This may cause implementations to override files on systems that don't support case insensitive file names. This should not be a real problem, as most file system won't let you create files with the same name but different cases. And, on Windows at leas

[widgets] Removing plugins attribute

In the P&C spec, I would really like to drop the access element's plugins attribute and just leave it to implementations to cope with proprietary content types. Does anyone have a problem with this? Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au

[widgets] Recent updates to packaging specification

Hi All, Given recent feedback, here is a summary of recent changes to the P&C spec. * Made boolean attribute values case sensitive. * Removed the check in section 8, step 2, whereby the user agent would do check if two files with the same name but different case existed. * Fixed all instances of

Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009

Hi Boris, On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > A few comments: > > 1) In section 7.3, boolean attributes are defined to use case-insensitive > matching. Why is that? There doesn't seem to be a definition of > case-insensitive here, which worries me, since case-folding is a

Re: [widgets] A proposal on widget modes

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:25:02 +0100, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group wrote: Hi Arve, Thanks for your feedback - I'm glad our thinking is along similar lines. Some responses to your comments below. Some responses below. Note that I have cut parts to which I have no direct answer yet. Applicatio

RE: [widgets] A proposal on widget modes

Hi Arve, Thanks for your feedback - I'm glad our thinking is along similar lines. Some responses to your comments below. Thanks, Mark >-Original Message- >From: Arve Bersvendsen [mailto:ar...@opera.com] >Sent: 20 January 2009 20:53 >To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; public-webapps >Subj