On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Michael A. Puls II
wrote:
> I think file:// should be a first class citizen when it comes to xhr (local
> page loading local .xml file for example).
>
> However, currently, there are some interoperability problems.
>
> 1. XHR doesn't work on local pages in IE. Yo
Hi Scott,
On Apr 16, 2009, at 18:18 , Scott Wilson wrote:
So far we haven't come across a widget thats needed more than - at
most - access to a few services, all coded as a single URL or single
domain. The only exception to the rule are RSS widgets, but these
are right at the other end of
Hi Thomas,
On Apr 16, 2009, at 17:23 , Thomas Roessler wrote:
1. How is the information in this access element going to be used at
installation time or distribution time? I'd like to see some spec
text that explains this.
My understanding is that this is like the feature element and others
Ok, all mentions of screenshot are gone from the spec. Added
to V2 feature list on Wiki.
Kind regards,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
wrote:
> Vodafone supports the proposal to drop screenshots from v1 of the
> Widgets specifications.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>>-O
