Re: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question aboutlatestversionof "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)

On Mon, 11 May 2009 15:10:57 +0200, wrote: > I received an email from Arve explaining the possible "spoofing" > scenario. Oops. I thought I'd sent that mail to everyone, and not just to Ivan personally. > He says this, and I think he is right: > >> Forgive my ignorance, but... "spoofing attack

RE: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question aboutlatestversionof "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)

I received an email from Arve explaining the possible "spoofing" scenario. He says this, and I think he is right: > Forgive my ignorance, but... "spoofing attack"? O_o 1. Widget A is started in "Floating mode" 2. Widget A requests, and gets a mode change to "Application mode" 3. Widget A creates

Re: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question aboutlatestversion of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)

On 5/11/09 1:43 PM, ivan.demar...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote: Forgive my ignorance, but... "spoofing attack"? O_o I guess Arve means click jacking. I'll explain the scenario I have in mind: - Widget calls the API "requestModeChange();" - WUA checks if that mode is valid (the string is valid)

RE: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question aboutlatestversion of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)

Forgive my ignorance, but... "spoofing attack"? O_o I'll explain the scenario I have in mind: - Widget calls the API "requestModeChange();" - WUA checks if that mode is valid (the string is valid) and if the WUA "likes" the mode (there could be WUA that supports only "fullscreen", for example) -

Re: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question about latestversion of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)

On Mon, 11 May 2009 13:14:40 +0200, wrote: > About the "widget requesting a resize", I sent in the past an email to > Arve about something similar but not quite the same: a sort of "request > mode change" or something. This would allow widgets to ASK the WUA for > "mode change". > Any news about

RE: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question about latestversion of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)

Hello. Better late then never: I sent this email 2 months ago :D But I see the flux of emails everyday on this mailing list, and I totally understand! Anyway, funny enough, just this morning I was saying to some colleagues that there is no current support in the config.xml for "declaring supporte

Re: [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths

Hi Jere, Let me try to clarify my thoughts... Note I'm actually suggesting an amended C3: one locale per resource, and one locale for element-based localization. For folder-based localization, my rationale is that it's useful to view a widget package as a local HTTP server because it allows