Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: > On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: > > On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: > > > > On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > These are very differe

Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'

Hi Ian, I hope you are planning to respond to this email. I think a lot of the discussion around "preventing errors" is related to the fallacy in your example below. Nikunj On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul

Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'

On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti wrote: > > - Why is the spec mandating a transaction to take an *exclusive write > lock on the entire database*? It is to avoid the possibility that two transactions will conflict and then have one be forced to roll back. For example, we want to

Re: [widgets] Package MIME Type

On Jul 29, 2009, at 1:05 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: In the widget's P&C spec it currently reads: [[ ISSUE: The application/widget media type has not yet been registered with IANA. This will happen when the specification reaches Candidate Recommendation status. ]] What steps do we need to tak

Re: proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript

Hi Anne, Alfonso, Thanks for your reply and the reference to Microsoft's range.expand. Please see my reply inline. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Initially I did not quite understand what this API was proposing, but after > reading it a few times it seems to mimic t

[widgets] Package MIME Type

In the widget's P&C spec it currently reads: [[ ISSUE: The application/widget media type has not yet been registered with IANA. This will happen when the specification reaches Candidate Recommendation status. ]] What steps do we need to take to remove the issue above from the spec (i.e., have the

Re: proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript

This is the Microsoft version: range.expand http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms536421%28VS.85%29.aspx 2009/7/29 Anne van Kesteren : > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:42:04 +0200, Xiaomei Ji wrote: >> We are proposing the following API to expose word breaker through >> JavaScript. >> document.exten

Re: proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:42:04 +0200, Xiaomei Ji wrote: > We are proposing the following API to expose word breaker through > JavaScript. > document.extendRange(range, "word") > It extends the passed-in range to a range in word boundary. > If the passed-in range is an empty range, in which the beg

[widgets] Draft Agenda for 30 July 2009 Voice Conference

Below is the draft agenda for the 30 July Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting). Logistics: Time: 22:00 Tokyo; 16:00 Helsinki; 15:00 Paris; 14:00 Lond

proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript

We are proposing the following API to expose word breaker through JavaScript. document.extendRange(range, "word") It extends the passed-in range to a range in word boundary. If the passed-in range is an empty range, in which the beginning and ending are the same, the empty range will be extended