(posting order moved to the bottom).
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Michael Nordmanmicha...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Here is an alternative proposal
Hi,
We have been going through the latest Early Draft [1] of the Window
Modes spec and I have followed the latest discussion that I could
discern from the mailing list ([2], [3]).
There was a request for feedback on the window modes spec and I hope
this feedback is useful and timely.
Initially
On 8/17/09 12:33 AM, Michael Nordman wrote:
Strictly speaking, I think the seperate 'Reader' class makes for a more
correct API. The two corners above would not conflict since each would
presumably be working with a distinct FileReader object. And the
seperate 'Reader' with event handlers seems
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Jeff
Deckerw3c-upda...@celestialwake.com wrote:
Hi All,
I noticed in the PC under Section 8.8.1 Attributes of the author Element
that the href attribute includes a line saying It is optional for authors
to use the xml:lang attribute with an author element.
Michael Nordman wrote:
Currently we have File and FileData, where a File object ISA FileData
object... completion is delivered via readXXX method completion callbacks.
It would be easy to add progress callbacks to those readXXX methods.
I think Garrets point about two different corners of the
I've now written the first draft of the PC test suite Prologue which
tells people how to write a test and what templates they can use. I've
also outlined what user agents need to support to run the tests (at a
mim, HTML4.01, and CSS 1 - though the tests are written to conform to
HTML5). I'm still
Is there a record anywhere of outstanding feedback on the progress events
spec? I looked in the issue tracker but there was only one issue there.
I was trying to integrate HTML5 with Progress Events today and found the
following problems:
- ProgressEvent.total has a requirement that I don't
The Application Cache feature in HTML5 uses an event named 'progress' as
part of the process, in a manner mostly unrelated to the rest of the
progress events feature. It needs two values of context information
(number of files being downloaded, number of files obtained so far).
Should I just
On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:57:51 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
xhr.open(GET, myFile.slice(x, y).fileDataURI);
xhr.send();
FWIW I'm opposed to abusing XMLHttpRequest in this way and I
actually think that when using the
On Aug 12, 2009, at 7:29 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Gregg Tavares wrote:
How about this?
Why make a new API for getting the contents of a file (local or
otherwise)
when we already have one which is XHR?
What if FileList was just array of File objects where each File
object is
just a
Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
On Aug 12, 2009, at 7:29 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Gregg Tavares wrote:
How about this?
Why make a new API for getting the contents of a file (local or
otherwise)
when we already have one which is XHR?
What if FileList was just array of File objects where each
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:12:50 -0400, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com
wrote:
Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
On Aug 12, 2009, at 7:29 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Gregg Tavares wrote:
How about this?
Why make a new API for getting the contents of a file (local or
otherwise)
when we already have
Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
On Aug 5, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
What's the use-case for getAsBase64?
I have another use case for this. The Atom Publishing protocol per RFC
5023 [1] accepts inline binary data represented in base 64 encoding.
In order to submit binary inline
I think it'd be great to have a *simple to use* API specifically for
loading local files on local pages (file://).
There's already DOM3 Load and Save, but few want anything to do with that
(it's not simple for one).
There's also the previous document.load, but it's half broken in Opera,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
I'd do
var reader = new DataReader(someDataObject, DataReader.BINARY);
reader.onload =
function(evt) {
// grab the data using evt.target.getData();
};
reader.read();
What's the advantage of this API over what I
15 matches
Mail list logo
