So that was one of the motives to add the creation callback on
openDatabase I presume.
In either case, before the script gets a Database object, a version check
needs to be made during openDatabase, so the value can be cached inside
the Database object, to be used for changeVersion, the v
If the version is stored in the database file itself, as is with webkit's
impl for example, the database object does not have immediate access to that
value.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:57 PM, João Eiras wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Database.changeVersion expects oldVersion and newVersion arguments. The
> Datab
Hi!
Database.changeVersion expects oldVersion and newVersion arguments. The
Database also specifies a version attribute.
The transaction steps tell to fail the transaction due to the failed
preflight condition if oldVersion does not match the current database
version.
Meanwhile, the callba
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
> Which of them supports to transfer arbitrary flavours?
> Generic image formats along of markup?
I do not recall off-hand.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/,
I support this.
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 11:01 AM
To: public-webapps
Subject: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec;
deadline 7 Sep
I approve.
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 11:01 AM
To: public-webapps
Subject: CfC: to publish a new Working Draft of Web Storage spec; deadline 7
September
This is a
Which of them supports to transfer arbitrary flavours?
Generic image formats along of markup?
thanks in advance
paul
Le 03-sept.-09 à 15:00, Ian Hickson a écrit :
Currently, Safari and IE support this API to some extent in their
respective shipping products, and Firefox either supports it in
(additional typo found, at bottom of email)
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> (Apologies for sending this twice, screwed up the subject on the last one...
> email is hard!:) )
>
> Hi Robin,
>
> Here is a pre-publication review of Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs 08
> September 2009.
The draft minutes from the September 3 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/09/03-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 10 September 2009
Hi Robin,
Here is a pre-publication review of Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs 08
September 2009.
My main beef is that this spec does not clearly tell me how to construct
a WURI UA... all the bits are there, however, just need a few editorial
changes, IMHO.
Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs
W3C Working Dr
Hi,
In step 10 of the processing model, it states:
"Queue a task to invoke the error callback, if it is not null, with a
newly constructed SQLError object that represents the last error to
have occurred in this transaction. Rollback the transaction. Any
still-pending statements in t
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Le 31-ao�t-09 � 04:44, Ian Hickson a �crit :
>
> > > Honestly, I find the whole DnD and CnP treatment in HTML5 quite much
> > > ad-hoc. It's welcome to have such an addition but it makes too many
> > > arrangements and still is hard to read.
> >
> >
(Apologies for sending this twice, screwed up the subject on the last
one... email is hard!:) )
Hi Robin,
Here is a pre-publication review of Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs 08
September 2009.
My main beef is that this spec does not clearly tell me how to construct
a WURI UA... all the bits are there
Hi Robin,
Thanks for your comments.
I believe the terminology could be clarified once the IRI/URI issue from P&C
gets solved in I18N, hopefully together with HREF and all related stuff.
+1 for simplification.
Thanks,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 |
Cameron McCormack wrote:
>> * modifying the interface prototype objects for the mixins does not
>> change the mixin prototype object (e.g. if you added a new property it
>> would not be visible);
>
> True. (We could make the prototype objects for the mixing interfaces
> special, such that e.g. do
15 matches
Mail list logo
