Re: The most basic File API use case

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> Hi Jonas, >> >> On Dec 10, 2009, at 19:42 , Jonas Sicking wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: [Constructor(DOMString mediaType, DOMString fileName)] >>

[Bug 8241] Named properties on window

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8241 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Kris Zyp wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > A few comments I've been meaning to suggest: > > * count on KeyRange - Previously I had asked if there would be a way > to get a count of the number of objects within a given key range. The > a

[widgets] follow-ups on the URI scheme spec

Re the URI scheme spec, there have been some followups on other publicly archived mail lists. In chronological order: 1. Jan 25 from Larry Masinter: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Jan/0075.html 2. Jan 29 from Art Barstow: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive

Re: localStorage Event

Ah, well then I think your suggestion would be ideal. -J On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > The source parameter was taken out of the spec for a while ago. And it > never worked in Chrome because the window may be in another process (and we > don't handle/allow cross-proce

Re: localStorage Event

The source parameter was taken out of the spec for a while ago. And it never worked in Chrome because the window may be in another process (and we don't handle/allow cross-process scripting). J On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Jared Morse wrote: > That would be a good solution in my opinion,

Re: localStorage Event

That would be a good solution in my opinion, although if you wanted to check if the event was dispatched by the current document or another, I believe you could use the source property that the spec currently contains, and just do something like: ev.source == window ? That seems to work as expect

Re: localStorage Event

We could change it to fire in all windows and have a boolean that says whether you fired it. Maybe that's the best solution? On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Jared Morse wrote: > Hi Jeremy, your patch (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30546) is > actually what brought this to my attenti

Re: localStorage Event

Hi Jeremy, your patch (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30546) is actually what brought this to my attention. I cannot think of an example where iframe's would not be sufficient as a work-around, however it could potentially be inconvenient to use them, especially when your app may be open

Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme

2010/1/29 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) > 2010/1/28 Maciej Stachowiak > > >> On Jan 28, 2010, at 8:39 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: >> >> It's interesting to note that on most modern OSes (Mac OS X, Vista, Win 7 >> ...) the OS actually does create a pre-computed high quality icon for many >> files, e.g

Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier

Arthur Barstow schrieb: Sebastian, All, On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:54 AM, ext Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote: About half a year ago I came up with an idea to add a unique window id as request header to each browser request. I published this initially on my website http://www.laliluna.de/blog/2009/05

Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing

On 1/27/10 9:39 AM, Zhiheng Wang wrote: Folks, Thanks to the much feedback from various developers, the WebTiming specs has undergone some major revision. Timing info has now been extended to page elements and a couple more interesting timing data points are added. The draft is up on http:

Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier

Sebastian, All, On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:54 AM, ext Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote: About half a year ago I came up with an idea to add a unique window id as request header to each browser request. I published this initially on my website http://www.laliluna.de/blog/2009/05/19/browser_feature_re

[widgets-interface] Marking Widget as [NoInterfaceObject]

Hi, http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-widgets-apis-20091222/#the-widget-interface currently declares the Widget interface without extended attributes. I believe it is not the goal of the specification to expose the interface itself in the global namespace, so I think it should be marked with a [NoInte

[XHR] New api request

Hi, how interest is for you develop new APIs in order to enable a reuse of the XMLHttpRequest objects, without the need to call abort method? -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos

One , multiple resources

This is an excerpt of something I wrote on the #webapps IRC channel: hm I have some exploratory work here (not going into details) let's just say that for feature isn't enough but an example is actually Opera's own Unite (looking a bit further, though) let's say I wanted to spawn two worke

Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Zhiheng Wang wrote: >> >> Also, what is the use case for the "Ticks" interface? >> > >> >    The Ticks interface is a convenient way to store time measurements >> > and >> > retrieve it later on a page. >> > I will have some example there. >> >> Why not just do: