On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Scott Wilson
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
In Wookie we just create the widget object in the global scope, and then add
it as an attribute to the window object. Author scripts can access it either
by window.widget or just plain widget.
I wonder though -
On Feb 11, 2010, at 05:40 , Doug Schepers wrote:
Scott Wilson wrote (on 2/9/10 10:32 AM):
There are a couple of additional areas it would be useful to consider
for future work in the Widgets space, specifically:
- inter-widget communication (both single-user and multi-user, e.g.
Hi,
I will not be able to join the telco this time.
Thanks,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
Hi Cyril,
On Feb 10, 2010, at 10:22 AM, ext Cyril Concolato wrote:
Dear Mr. Barstow,
As indicated in the mails about MPEG-U, I would like to request
that the WG discusses the MPEG liaison regarding widgets. Could you
add it to the agenda ?
We can do so provided you agree to never again
On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:32 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
On Feb 11, 2010, at 05:40 , Doug Schepers wrote:
Scott Wilson wrote (on 2/9/10 10:32 AM):
There are a couple of additional areas it would be useful to
consider
for future work in the Widgets space, specifically:
- inter-widget
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
And I think the answer is yes. Any time someone talks about an
Hi, Art-
Thanks for the feedback.
Arthur Barstow wrote (on 2/9/10 9:34 AM):
On Feb 8, 2010, at 7:25 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote:
We are interested in comments to refine the charter before submitting it
to the Advisory Committee and W3C management for review.
[1]
Hi, Folks-
Per the telcon today, I have explicitly added a Widget Embedding
deliverable to the charter [1] to allow widgets to be referenced from
other web content, much as a '.swf' or '.flv' file is referenced in
html:object. This is a small but vital aspect of widgets that should
round
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:58:40 +0100, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote:
[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html
Sorry for being late.
Should it say DOM Level 4 Core rather than just DOM Level 4? If not maybe
DOM Level 4 Events and new editions of existing DOM
Hi Cyril,
On Feb 11, 2010, at 14:03 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 10:22 AM, ext Cyril Concolato wrote:
Dear Mr. Barstow,
We can do so provided you agree to never again call me Mr. Barstow :-).
Yeah, we wouldn't want to anger Mr. Barstow.
Seriously though, yes we can add it
Hi, Anne-
Thanks for your feedback.
Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 2/11/10 11:06 AM):
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:58:40 +0100, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote:
[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html
Sorry for being late.
NP, just in time.
Should it say DOM Level 4 Core
Hi, folks-
I've meant to mention this for a while (a couple years), and it's
probably too late, but I thought I'd drop it in for future consideration.
One odd part of the separation of content and presentation is that a
stylesheet is applied to a file by including a link to the stylesheet in
On 2/11/10 11:57 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
One odd part of the separation of content and presentation is that a
stylesheet is applied to a file by including a link to the stylesheet in
the target file. That is totally backward.
Strictly speaking, this is just because most people don't have
The draft minutes from the 11 February Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/11-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 18 February (the
Hi, Boris-
Boris Zbarsky wrote (on 2/11/10 12:04 PM):
On 2/11/10 11:57 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
One odd part of the separation of content and presentation is that a
stylesheet is applied to a file by including a link to the stylesheet in
the target file. That is totally backward.
Strictly
On 2/11/10 12:18 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Ah, interesting... I didn't know that, thanks! Is this [1] the most
recent reference on that?
I believe so, yes.
Still, I think adding a way to do this in the Widgets manifest would be
a nice authoring solution.
Sure; just have to make sure to
Hi Dom, All
During the 4-Feb-2010 widgets voice conference, we discussed how to
test WebApps' WARP spec [WARP] and Marcos raised concerns about how
to test the spec given it requires at least two domains to test
against since the test cases will make cross-domain requests:
Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Boris-
Boris Zbarsky wrote (on 2/11/10 12:04 PM):
On 2/11/10 11:57 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
One odd part of the separation of content and presentation is that a
stylesheet is applied to a file by including a link to the stylesheet in
the target file. That is totally
I can't help but think the Growl issue is way overblown. I am the user who
uses Growl and also a GoogleTalkLabsEdition for Mac that pop ups nice
notifications about upcoming meetings, email and chat. Growl is connected to
IRC and something else (don't even remember). They both use top-right corner
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
At Opera we've been discussing some of the security implications around the
openURL method in the widgets API spec. We think the spec might benefit if
we were to add a non-normative security consideration section for
Anne, All,
WebApps has been asked to review LCWD #3 of:
Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies 1.0
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ct-guidelines-20100211/
In particular, Francois notes for the following for WebApps the
document applies to proxies that may receive requests initiated
21 matches
Mail list logo
