On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> Another nit: as far as I can tell, all of the common parts of the
> interfaces are named Foo, the synchronous API portion is FooSync, and the
> async API portion is FooRequest. This is tr
>
> Thanks Addison - and yes, I think this makes a lot of sense for a
> "content"-style spec like HTML, however as the Widgets P&C is a
> configuration document most of which is IRIs, integers and so on
> rather than text content its less of a clear case.
>
No, I understand and don't disagree. H
Thanks for the pointers. I'm actually pretty sold on the general idea of
promises, and my intuition is that there won't be a very big resource
penalty for using an API like this rather than callbacks or what's currently
specced. At the same time, it seems as though there isn't much of a
standard
On 1 Mar 2010, at 17:58, Phillips, Addison wrote:
Hi Scott,
One reason to make 'dir' available on higher-level elements is that
'dir', like 'xml:lang', has scope. It is often useful to specify a
"base" directionality for an entire document or block of elements
rather than having to repea
Hi Scott,
One reason to make 'dir' available on higher-level elements is that 'dir', like
'xml:lang', has scope. It is often useful to specify a "base" directionality
for an entire document or block of elements rather than having to repeat it
over-and-over on each affected element. I can agree
Hi Marcos,
On 26 Feb 2010, at 17:44, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi i18n WG,
I've added the dir attribute and span elements to the Widgets P&C
Specification, as well as a bunch of examples (which are wrong, so I
would really appreciate some help with these!).
The dir attribute is specified here:
htt
Editors, All - FYI, some information from the I18N group re normative
reference for language tags.
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Richard Ishida
Date: March 1, 2010 9:53:20 AM EST
Subject: Information about latest specs for language tagging
It seems that a number of people are unaware o
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Scott Wilson
wrote:
>
> On 22 Feb 2010, at 18:11, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
>> Dear i18n core,
>>
>> I'm writing on behalf of the Web Apps WG about the possibility of
>> conducting a joint teleconference to discuss some issues with the ITS [1]
>> features in the Wid
