This is a re-post from the WHATWG mailing list.
They've suggested I take the discussion to this list, as
pointer events have not yet been formalized.
I'd like to know if there's room or any work has been done to set aside a
standard for an extended set of pointer-device events.
With
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/1/2010 2:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Thanks for the pointers. I'm actually pretty sold on the general
idea of promises, and my intuition is that there won't be a very
Hi Art,
Thanks for forwarding this. I've added PC with the new BCP47
reference. I've also removed the reference to the obsolete RFC 4647
(PC now links to RFC5646).
Kind regards,
Marcos
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Editors, All - FYI, some
Below is the draft agenda and logistics for the March 4 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened
meeting). Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before
the
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/1/2010 2:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Thanks for the pointers. I'm actually pretty sold on the
Erm... s/differed/deferred/g
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/3/2010 4:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com
mailto:k...@sitepen.com wrote:
[snip]
The promises would only have a
then method which would take in an
onsuccess and onerror
