Event handlers - Pointer Devices

This is a re-post from the WHATWG mailing list. They've suggested I take the discussion to this list, as pointer events have not yet been formalized. I'd like to know if there's room or any work has been done to set aside a standard for an extended set of pointer-device events. With touch

Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices

Hi, Charles- Indeed, there has already been some concrete discussion on this, and we plan to take up work on such a specification in the next couple of months. It's been explicitly included in our draft rechartering [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/#aide Regards- -Doug Schepe

Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Kris Zyp wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 3/1/2010 2:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > > Thanks for the pointers. I'm actually pretty sold on the general > > idea of promises, and my intuition is that there won't be a very > > big re

Re: Information about latest specs for language tagging

Hi Art, Thanks for forwarding this. I've added P&C with the new BCP47 reference. I've also removed the reference to the obsolete RFC 4647 (P&C now links to RFC5646). Kind regards, Marcos On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Editors, All - FYI, some information from the I18N gr

[widgets] Draft agenda for 4 March 2010 voice conf

Below is the draft agenda and logistics for the March 4 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting). Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the

Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Kris Zyp wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> On 3/1/2010 2:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: >> > Thanks for the pointers. I'm actually pretty sold on the general >> > idea of p

Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)

Erm... s/differed/deferred/g On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Kris Zyp wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/1/2010 2:52 PM, Jeremy Or

Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/3/2010 4:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Kris Zyp > wrote: > [snip] > > > The promises would only have a > "then" method which would take in an > > > onsuccess and onerror callb