Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter

On Mar 25, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Maciej, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:50 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote: WARP is a split from P+C, its ancestor is in the first draft. Sounds fine to document it that way, since the precursor

Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft

On 1/31/2010 11:33 PM, Nikunj Mehta wrote: a. 3.1.3: do we really need in-line + out-of-line keys? Besides the concept-count increase, we wonder whether out-of-line keys would cause trouble to generic libraries, as the values for the keys wouldn't be part of the values iterated when doing

Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter

Hi Maciej, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:50 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> WARP is a split from P+C, its ancestor is in the first draft. >> >> Sounds fine to document it that way, since the precursor is not clear from >> backtracking through "prev