Re: [IndexedDB] Granting storage quotas

2010-04-21 Thread Mark Seaborn
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Shawn Wilsher sdwi...@mozilla.com wrote: On 4/20/2010 4:11 AM, Mark Seaborn wrote: 1) It doesn't allow a web app to ask for a storage allocation up front, before it starts to consume the storage. Why does that matter? It doesn't support the use cases that

Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

2010-04-21 Thread Mark S. Miller
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.comwrote: On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:27:10 +0900, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Why can't it be made exactly like UMP? All of the requirements in UMP have been discussed at length and in great detail on this list by some

Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

2010-04-21 Thread Tyler Close
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: Uniform doesn't tell you much about what it is doing. The term uniform in Uniform Messaging Policy (UMP) is used in the same sense as it is used in Uniform Resource Identifier (URI). In particular, the following from RFC

Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

2010-04-21 Thread Ojan Vafai
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:27:10 +0900, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Why can't it be made exactly like UMP? All of the

Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)

2010-04-21 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote: On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.comwrote: On Feb 18, 2010, at

Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)

2010-04-21 Thread Nikunj Mehta
On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote: On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Nikunj

Re: [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)

2010-04-21 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote: On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.comwrote: On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Jeremy

Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

2010-04-21 Thread Mark S. Miller
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: I agree that Anonymous or Anon is more clear as to the purpose than Uniform. In the same say this email is anonymous. Sure, I say it is from MarkM, but my browser doesn't add any identifying info that you can see. Even

Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

2010-04-21 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 21, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: I agree that Anonymous or Anon is more