Ian Hickson wrote on 5/24/2010 7:55 PM:
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Bil Corry wrote:
Adam Barth wrote on 7/16/2009 10:38 AM:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Bil Corryb...@corry.biz wrote:
I think you mean everything will NOT be privacy-sensitive except non-XHR
GETs.
I don't think we've quite
Dear All,
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote:
Hi, Folks-
Sorry to jump in on this thread so late; I've been busy and traveling.
As W3C Team Contact for this group, I strongly agree with Ian here regarding
the tone of some of the responses. Technical
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
W3C's widget specs are mature (i.e., most at CR or LC) and the working
group believes them to be technically sound and, with a few
extensions, able to meet the use cases of [2] (particularly in light
of Google using the
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Bil Corry wrote:
The only reference I could find was in 2.6 Fetching Resources:
---8---
For the purposes of the Origin header, if the fetching algorithm was
explicitly initiated from an origin, then the origin that initiated the
HTTP request is origin.
On May 25, 2010, at 10:27 , Aaron Boodman wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
W3C's widget specs are mature (i.e., most at CR or LC) and the working
group believes them to be technically sound and, with a few
extensions, able to meet the use cases of
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
W3C's widget specs are mature (i.e., most at CR or LC) and the working
group believes them to be technically sound and, with a few
extensions, able to
Original Message
Subject: RfC: 11-May-2010 LCWD of Digital Signatures for Widgets spec;
deadline 1 June 2010
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:09:53 +0200
From: Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
Reply-To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org
To: public-webapps
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, bugzi...@jessica.w3.org wrote:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9793
Summary: Allow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/24/2010 2:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com wrote:
or to use something like
put(record, {forbidOverwrite: true}); // don't overwrite
put(record, {onlyOverwrite: true}); // must
