Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting

2010-08-31 Thread Arthur Barstow
The WebApps WG will meet face-to-face November 1-2 as part of the W3C's 2010 TPAC meeting week [TPAC]. I created a stub agenda item page and seek input to flesh out agenda: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TPAC2010 [TPAC] includes a link to the Registration page, a detailed schedule of

Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces

2010-08-31 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:

Re: Lifetime of Blob URL

2010-08-31 Thread Darin Fisher
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.comwrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:22:45 +0200, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: Another idea (possibly a crazy one) would be to eliminate Blob, and just use File for everything. We could rename BlobBuilder to FileBuilder

Blob/File naming

2010-08-31 Thread Adrian Bateman
On Monday, August 30, 2010 1:09 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote: *sigh.  Naming continues to be hard.  Not everyone's thrilled with the proliferation of Blob in the API [1] including other major implementors (my co-editor

Re: [XHR] Redirects

2010-08-31 Thread Darin Fisher
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:13:16 +0200, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com wrote: Between the boolean and an integer, the integer is more useful, although seeing long redirection chains is somewhat rare and overkill. I

Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces

2010-08-31 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:

Re: [XHR] Redirects

2010-08-31 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:04:08 +0200, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: So the idea is that you would have to manually create the redirect request using a new XHR if you wanted to manually follow the redirect? Yeah, or you could reset the existing object using open(). One risk with

Re: [XHR] Redirects

2010-08-31 Thread Darin Fisher
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:04:08 +0200, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: So the idea is that you would have to manually create the redirect request using a new XHR if you wanted to manually follow the redirect?

Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces

2010-08-31 Thread Shawn Wilsher
On 8/31/2010 12:03 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: So IMHO we should heavily optimize for javascript, while ensuring that other languages are possible. Yes, please. Cheers, Shawn smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [XHR] Redirects

2010-08-31 Thread João Eiras
On , Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:13:16 +0200, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com wrote: Between the boolean and an integer, the integer is more useful, although seeing long redirection chains is somewhat rare and overkill. I went for a boolean