On 17 Sep 2010, at 01:30, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
>> There are many applications that are currently stuck using a server
>> because there is no clear path to deploying 100% client side
>> applications, examples include micro-blogging clients, note/task-pads,
>> image editors, contact
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> > Wait a sec. What are the use cases for non-object curs
Do we have a sense yet regarding who supports XBL2 as in the 2007
Candidate version [CR] versus who supports the version Hixie recently
published in [Draft]?
Feedback from all (potential) implementers would be especially useful.
Thinking aloud here, perhaps [Draft] could be positioned more li
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Do we have a sense yet regarding who supports XBL2 as in the 2007 Candidate
> version [CR] versus who supports the version Hixie recently published in
> [Draft]?
>
> Feedback from all (potential) implementers would be especially useful.
>
>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Julian Reschke
> wrote:
I think that obtaining the resolved Location for the redirect is the
most tricky part, and we should come up with a solution where that is
also available for people who d
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Julian Reschke
>> wrote:
>>> That sounds good to me. In general I think it would be great if there were
>>> standard APIs for URI/IRI construction, parsi
Adam Barth wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Julian Reschke
wrote:
That sounds good to me. In general I think it would be great if there were
standard APIs for URI/IRI construction
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Darin Fisher
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Julian Reschke
> >> wrote:
> >>> That sounds good to me. In general I think it would be gre
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Darin Fisher
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Julian Reschke
>> >> wrote:
>
On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Darin Fisher
wrote:
> On Thu, S
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:51:27 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
That would be different behavior than what Location and
HTMLAnchorElement do; they unescape various componenents. Is the benefit
worth the divergence?
As a side note, an out-of-document HTMLAnchorElement already provides
most o
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Here's a sketch:
https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=1
On 9/17/10, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Darin Fisher
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Here's a sketch:
>
>
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow
>> >> wro
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
> On 9/17/10, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Garrett Smith
>> wrote:
>>> Where is Dictionary defined?
>>
>> It might not be defined yet.
>
> You don't know if it is defined or not? Makes no sense at all.
That's correc
On 9/17/10, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Garrett Smith
> wrote:
>> On 9/17/10, Adam Barth wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Garrett Smith
>>> wrote:
Where is Dictionary defined?
>>>
>>> It might not be defined yet.
>>
>> You don't know if it is defined or
I've removed the searchParameters attribute from the URL interface for
the time being. We can consider adding it back at a later time.
Adam
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
> On 9/17/10, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Garrett Smith
>> wrote:
>>> On
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> I've removed the searchParameters attribute from the URL interface for
> the time being. We can consider adding it back at a later time.
;_;
Just today my cubemate asked me if there was any way to get at the
search parameters of a URL without
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
I've removed the searchParameters attribute from the URL interface for
the time being. We can consider adding it back at a later time.
;_;
Just today my cubemate asked me if there was any way to get at the
search param
On 9/17/10, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> I've removed the searchParameters attribute from the URL interface for
>> the time being. We can consider adding it back at a later time.
>
> ;_;
>
> Just today my cubemate asked me if there was any way to
hi
> You mean you didn't mention that I drafted a much better one over two
> years ago?
>
Garrett : could you send a link to your ES4 draft/proposal ? My simple
google skills couldn't find it.
thanks
devdatta
> And you felt this API was worth mentioning?
>
> My criticism is spot-on and appropr
On Sep 17, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>> It might be nice to provide the parts of this that make sense on
>> HTMLAnchorElement and Location, then see if a new interface really pulls its
>> weight.
>
> Another piece of fu
On 9/17/10, Devdatta Akhawe wrote:
> hi
>
>> You mean you didn't mention that I drafted a much better one over two
>> years ago?
>>
>
> Garrett : could you send a link to your ES4 draft/proposal ? My simple
> google skills couldn't find it.
>
I thought I linked to that earlier but don't see it now
23 matches
Mail list logo
