On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 11/15/10 6:55 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
>>
>> How would setInterval with multiple functions on
>> mozRequestAnimationFrame solve this issue? They are still all going to
>> get called at the fastest interval right?
>
> Why?
>
> setInte
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen proposals for something more like
>>>
>>> element.setInternvalIfVisible(func, internva
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>
>> If you really want to animate in 10Hz steps, then I suggest you do
>> something like
>> var start = window.animationTime;
>> var rate = 10; // Hz
>> var duration = 10; //
On 11/15/10 7:45 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
Does it matter? What happens now? Now, with setInterval there is no
connection to rendering. I set the code to update one element to have an
interval of 16 and another to have an interval of 100. If the first one
makes the second one visible that do
On 11/15/10 6:55 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
How would setInterval with multiple functions on
mozRequestAnimationFrame solve this issue? They are still all going to
get called at the fastest interval right?
Why?
setInterval(function() {
window.requestAnimationFrame(function redrawElem1()
* Jonas Sicking wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> The frame rate is a number in the swf header that cannot be set to a "as
>> fast as possible" value.
>
>Ah, so that also means that different animations can't run with
>different frame rates?
That's the basic mode
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann
> wrote:
> > * Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
> >>There is plenty of flash content that has a lower than 60hz (or fast as
> >>possible) refresh rate. When something is instead implementing in HT
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
>>There is plenty of flash content that has a lower than 60hz (or fast as
>>possible) refresh rate. When something is instead implementing in HTML5
>>instead of Flash what should they do to get the similar resu
* Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
>There is plenty of flash content that has a lower than 60hz (or fast as
>possible) refresh rate. When something is instead implementing in HTML5
>instead of Flash what should they do to get the similar results? Checking
>cnn.com, time.com, arstechnica.com, wired.com an
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
>
>> I've seen proposals for something more like
>>
>> element.setInternvalIfVisible(func, internval);
>>
>> Which is the same as setInterval but only gets called if the e
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Jonas Sicking:
>> Since I wrote the IDL for indexeddb above, WebIDL has gotten support
>> for "static" which should do what we want. Though it's a bit unclear
>> if using a real interface would cause there to be a .prototype
>> property o
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
>
>> One is, how should this api be used if I want an app to update at 10hz.
>> It seems to be designed to assume I want the maximum frame rate. If I want
>> to run slower woul
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk)
> wrote:
>>
>> One is, how should this api be used if I want an app to update at 10hz.
>> It seems to be designed to assume I want the maximum frame rate. If I want
>> to run slower
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
> I've seen proposals for something more like
>
> element.setInternvalIfVisible(func, internval);
>
> Which is the same as setInterval but only gets called if the element is
> visible. With that kind of API there is no connection
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
> One is, how should this api be used if I want an app to update at 10hz. It
> seems to be designed to assume I want the maximum frame rate. If I want to
> run slower would I just use
>
> setInterval(function() {
>window.requestAnim
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 11/15/10 6:03 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
>
>> One is, how should this api be used if I want an app to update at 10hz.
>> It seems to be designed to assume I want the maximum frame rate.
>>
>
> The initial API was designed to replace
On 11/15/10 6:03 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote:
One is, how should this api be used if I want an app to update at 10hz.
It seems to be designed to assume I want the maximum frame rate.
The initial API was designed to replace setTimeout(..., 0) animations,
yeah. The idea was to ask for "anim
following in the footsteps of a previous thread
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0223.html
I'd like to see if there is some consensus on this issue. Various people are
anxious to see this happen in more browsers.
A couple of questions came up for requestAnimationFrame
SGTM
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Arun Ranganathan
wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On 11/12/10 11:53 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>> > OK, then we need to define rules for instantiating a Date object
>> > here
>> > (in the face of strings that may or may not be valid date format
>> > st
We've been working on getting the Widget Updates specification in to
publication shape over the last few weeks and it would be good to get
further review of the current specification with a view to pushing it to
Last Call.
The latest draft of this specification can be found here:
http://dev.w3.or
Anne has addressed all of the open Actions and Issue for Progress Events
[A&I]. As such, he proposes it be published as a Last Call Working Draft
and this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to do so:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the
21 matches
Mail list logo
