Hi, Folks-
This is an active call for editors for the Server-sent Events [1], Web
Storage [2], and Web Workers [3] specifications. If you are interested
in becoming an editor, with all the rights and responsibilities that go
along with that, please respond on this thread or email us directly
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Doug Schepers wrote:
This is an active call for editors for the Server-sent Events [1], Web
Storage [2], and Web Workers [3] specifications. If you are interested
in becoming an editor, with all the rights and responsibilities that go
along with that, please respond
Hi, Ian-
Ian Hickson wrote (on 12/13/10 4:24 PM):
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Doug Schepers wrote:
This is an active call for editors for the Server-sent Events [1], Web
Storage [2], and Web Workers [3] specifications. If you are interested
in becoming an editor, with all the rights and
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote:
Hi, Ian-
Ian Hickson wrote (on 12/13/10 4:24 PM):
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Doug Schepers wrote:
This is an active call for editors for the Server-sent Events [1], Web
Storage [2], and Web Workers [3] specifications. If you
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Doug Schepers wrote:
Ian, the Technical Report work is what W3C does.
I'm not sure how to interpret this. Do you mean that's the work W3C staff
does? Or that's the work that the consortium is set up to foster? Neither
is presumably true: W3C staff aren't the ones who do
Hi, Ian-
I'm sorry if it wasn't clear that we hope to keep you on as co-editor,
if you are willing and able.
I simply don't have time (nor, frankly, am I interested) in having a
political or philosophical debate about what an editor is or isn't, or
what makes a spec stable, or whether W3C
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote:
Hi, Ian-
I'm sorry if it wasn't clear that we hope to keep you on as co-editor, if
you are willing and able.
I simply don't have time (nor, frankly, am I interested) in having a
political or philosophical debate about
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote:
But we are looking for more than someone to just push TR copies, we want
someone who (like Ian) understands the issues, and knows how to help drive
progress through consensus and technical expertise, and who can dedicate
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Doug Schepers wrote:
But we are looking for more than someone to just push TR copies, we want
someone who (like Ian) understands the issues, and knows how to help
drive progress through consensus and technical expertise, and who can
dedicate themselves to the task.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.comwrote:
We definitely have use-cases that require the shadow DOM to be
dynamically
updated when an element that expands to a template instance has its
subtree
changed. Almost every application that combines dynamic DOM
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com
wrote:
We definitely have use-cases that require the shadow DOM to be
dynamically
updated when an element that expands to a template instance
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
[...] You aren't asking for someone to do all that though, you're just
asking for someone to occasionally do a bit of administrative work. I
have the bandwidth to help with that if necessary.
Quick update: Tab and I have set up a system whereby
On 12/13/10 5:46 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Ah, you're thinking about changes to the normal DOM. We're afraid of
changes to the template.
I think roc explicitly said that he thinks the XBL2 spec's section on
this seems ... dispensable.
I agree with him, for what it's worth.
-Boris
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 12/13/10 5:46 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Ah, you're thinking about changes to the normal DOM. We're afraid of
changes to the template.
I think roc explicitly said that he thinks the XBL2 spec's section on this
seems
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
Then there's no problem. You don't need the templates to be live to
make child changes work. You just need to maintain some record that
any normal-DOM elements which match * should appear as children of
the shadow
15 matches
Mail list logo
