Dear Marcos,
[this is a reply on behalf of the Internationalization Core WG]
We agree that not providing a default locale for a Widget is an oversight in
the Widget's localization model. The ability to provide multiple languages in
the configuration file or in the locales directory structure
This discussion reminds me of a similar issue with MessagePorts. The
original MessagePort spec exposed GC behavior through the use of onclose
events/closed attributes on MessagePorts. It turns out that on Chromium,
there are situations where it's very difficult for us to GC MessagePorts (a
port's
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
This discussion reminds me of a similar issue with MessagePorts. The
original MessagePort spec exposed GC behavior through the use of onclose
events/closed attributes on MessagePorts. It turns out that on Chromium,
there
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
This discussion reminds me of a similar issue with MessagePorts. The
original MessagePort spec exposed GC behavior through the use of onclose
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
This discussion reminds me of a similar issue with MessagePorts. The
original MessagePort spec exposed GC behavior through the use of onclose
events/closed attributes on MessagePorts. It turns out that on Chromium,
there
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
This discussion reminds me of a similar issue with MessagePorts. The
original MessagePort spec exposed GC behavior through the use of onclose
events/closed attributes on MessagePorts. It turns out that on Chromium,
there
In some cases we leak them, yes (they live for the life of the parent
context) if the developer does not close them. Typically this is only when
you've cloned a MessagePort and sent the other end to a different process.
Trying to figure out if a port is reachable when the entangled port lives in
a
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
For what it's worth, shared workers already expose GC behavior. You'll
get a already-existing shared worker, or a new one will be created,
depending on if GC has collected the worker or not.
Hmmm. That was certainly not
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
That said, it would still help prevent non-malicious but misbehaving
scripts from accidentally taking over the browser, which can happen
anywhere, even on trusted sites. However, that's just one possible way of
dealing
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
(Hello, Brandon)
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Brandon Andrews
warcraftthre...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Regarding forcing a user action before the mouse is captured/grabbed I
think it's pivotal. If a page can simply call a method to capture the mouse
everytime it's released it because
Hm, Jeremy is right, If you want to look just at the transaction and
see why it aborted you can't rely on errorCode. Ick.
The only thing I'd change then is the abortMessage property. It's
easier to tell why your transaction aborted with the error code, and
I'd hate people doing string comparisons
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:17 PM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm, Jeremy is right, If you want to look just at the transaction and
see why it aborted you can't rely on errorCode. Ick.
The only thing I'd change then is the abortMessage property. It's
easier to tell why your
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
In some cases we leak them, yes (they live for the life of the parent
context) if the developer does not close them. Typically this is only when
you've cloned a MessagePort and sent the other end to a different process.
Normal exceptions have error messages that are not consistient across
implementations and are not localized. What's the difference?
These messages aren't part of any exception though, it's just some
property on a transaction object. (None of our DOM exceptions, IDB or
otherwise, have message
2011/2/7 Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
If we want to make the quota API treat each API differently this would
make a lot sense, but I'm not fully
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Another related issue: what happens if a long-running number-cruncher worker
keeps a database open while it works, to read data or output results?
There's no API for sending versionchange events for IDBDatabaseSync, and it
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:37 PM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
Normal exceptions have error messages that are not consistient across
implementations and are not localized. What's the difference?
These
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:37 PM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
Normal exceptions have error messages that are not consistient across
implementations and are not localized. What's the difference?
These messages aren't part of any exception though, it's just some
property on a
(It's somewhat frustrating when they come back localized, but bearable.)
Sounds like what you really want is more specific error codes, not
really messages, right?
-Ben
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Another related issue: what happens if a long-running number-cruncher
worker
keeps a database open while it works, to read data or output results?
I hate to ask, since there could be use cases I'm missing, but what is a
use
case where a browser would need to grab the mouse immediately when the
page
starts? I'm not against the idea, but it might need a strategy to stop
abuse.
Here are some steps I see happening. If I load a
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:04 PM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
(It's somewhat frustrating when they come back localized, but bearable.)
Sounds like what you really want is more specific error codes, not
really messages, right?
Not always:
- Some errors are
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:04 PM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
(It's somewhat frustrating when they come back localized, but bearable.)
Sounds like what you really want is more specific error codes, not
really
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:37 PM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Normal exceptions have error messages that are not consistient across
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Another related issue: what happens if a long-running number-cruncher
worker
keeps
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Brandon Andrews
warcraftthre...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
If I load a first-person game in a tab, I shouldn't need to click the
window
to allow the page to capture the mouse. That'll force every game to
start
with a superfluous box saying click here to start.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Brandon Andrews
warcraftthre...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Actually this would be used for both fullscreen and non-fullscreen
applications.
The reason for this is because it's often CPU intensive to run a complex
canvas
application in fullscreen.
Looking forward
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
- Some errors are implementation-specific. For example, if internal
error
is caused by SQLite under the hood returning an unexpected error that the
browser can't recover from, the browser could include the SQLite error
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
What are some real use-cases for capturing with the mouse up in
non-fullscreen windows? Do a significant number of users want to play
mouse-capturing games in non-fullscreen mode?
I'd certainly want to be able to
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
It applies to non-game uses, too. For example, a common annoyance with
Google Maps is when you're dragging the map and your mouse cursor hits the
side of the screen, the map stops moving; you have to release the button and
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Brandon Andrews
warcraftthre...@sbcglobal.net
wrote: If I load a first-person game in a tab, I shouldn't need to click
the
window to allow the page to capture the mouse. That'll force every
game
to start with a superfluous box saying click here to
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Brandon Andrews
warcraftthre...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
So what you'd prefer would be to allow the mouse to call
element.lockMouse(), element.unlockMouse() whenever it wanted. Then assume
the user-agent will perform restrictions?
These restrictions would be asking
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Brandon Andrews
warcraftthre...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
So what you'd prefer would be to allow the mouse to call
element.lockMouse(),
element.unlockMouse() whenever it wanted. Then assume the user-agent will
perform restrictions?
These restrictions would be
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12027
Summary: #21621;#21621;#21621; as these tend to change
rapidly and make your feedback hard
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL:
(back!)
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 6:47 PM
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
40 matches
Mail list logo
