On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12032
j...@jrn.me.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com, 2011-02-10 16:55 -0800:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Is there somewhere that such issues should be filed?
I'm not sure about the File API--it used to use [2], but I'm not sure
if it still does.
I've got [3] for FileWriter
Increasingly, web applications are centered around JSON-based content,
and utilize JavaScript to render JSON to HTML. Such applications
(sometimes called single page applications) frequently employ changes to
the hash portion of the current URL to provide back/forward navigation
and
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:48:26 +0100, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com wrote:
Increasingly, web applications are centered around JSON-based content,
and utilize JavaScript to render JSON to HTML. Such applications
(sometimes called single page applications) frequently employ changes to
the hash portion
On 2/11/2011 6:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:48:26 +0100, Kris Zyp k...@sitepen.com wrote:
Increasingly, web applications are centered around JSON-based content,
and utilize JavaScript to render JSON to HTML. Such applications
(sometimes called single page
On 11.02.2011 14:48, Kris Zyp wrote:
Increasingly, web applications are centered around JSON-based content,
and utilize JavaScript to render JSON to HTML. Such applications
(sometimes called single page applications) frequently employ changes to
the hash portion of the current URL to provide
On 2/11/2011 7:15 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 11.02.2011 14:48, Kris Zyp wrote:
Increasingly, web applications are centered around JSON-based content,
and utilize JavaScript to render JSON to HTML. Such applications
(sometimes called single page applications) frequently employ changes to
the
On 11.02.2011 15:40, Kris Zyp wrote:
...
Sounds very interesting.
Did you consider making the link point to an HTML(+Script) page, and
placing the JSON object into that pages script context somehow?
Yes, I had considered that. However, I believe that most webapps that
would use this API
Hi all,
the current File API: Directories and System seems to use
callbacks and not events, yet other
File APIs (the ones for read and write) use events.
That is quite major inconsistency in the APIs.
IIRC there was already some discussion about which approach to use
when the API for read was
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:06 PM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
I think generally avoiding throwing exceptions is a good thing. So for
.errorCode I would say returning unidentified or 0 is the way to go.
I would say we should add a code to IDBDatabaseException, NO_ERR = 0.
Or
It looks like I was wrong. Our current impl throws NOT_ALLOWED_ERR for
getting errorCode *and* result before readyState is set to DONE.
And now that I think about it I think I like that best. If we returned
NO_ERR from errorCode before DONE then it seems to imply that the
request succeeded when
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like I was wrong. Our current impl throws NOT_ALLOWED_ERR for
getting errorCode *and* result before readyState is set to DONE.
And now that I think about it I think I like that best. If we returned
NO_ERR from
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com
wrote:
It looks like I was wrong. Our current impl throws NOT_ALLOWED_ERR for
getting errorCode *and* result before readyState is set to DONE.
And
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
Hi all,
the current File API: Directories and System seems to use
callbacks and not events, yet other
File APIs (the ones for read and write) use events.
That is quite major inconsistency in the APIs.
IIRC there was
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Michael[tm] Smith m...@w3.org wrote:
Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com, 2011-02-10 16:55 -0800:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Is there somewhere that such issues should be filed?
I'm not sure about the File API--it used to use
Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com, 2011-02-11 15:10 -0800:
Michael, thanks. However, I chose to use the tracker originally since
that's what the File API was using. I'd rather not have 2 different
places to log issues. If there's a strong reason I should move to
Bugzilla, let me know, but
17 matches
Mail list logo
