Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

2011-02-14 Thread Simon Pieters
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:15:04 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:28:56 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:

Re: [webstorage] Moving Web Storage back to Last Call WD

2011-02-14 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: What high priority work must be done such that this spec is ready to be re-published as a new Last Call Working draft? Tab, do you know of anything that is blocking redoing an LC? (Personally I'm fine with it going to REC yesterday, so...)

Re: [workers] Moving the Web Workers spec back to Last Call WD

2011-02-14 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: Regarding re-publishing the Web Workers spec [ED] as a new Last Call Working Draft ... Bugzilla shows one open bug [Bugs]: 11818 - As documented in the Creating workers section, a worker *must* be an external script.

Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call

2011-02-14 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: Regarding re-publishing the Server-sent Events spec [ED] as a new Last Call Working Draft ... 1. 11835 - EventSource must support cross-domain requests (ala CORS) http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11835 This will be supported once

Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)

2011-02-14 Thread Kinuko Yasuda
Thanks for all the feedbacks so far. Now that the thread became quieter, I hope we're getting agreed, at least on the basic concept. To make the points clearer, let me summarize what is being proposed (and what is not) with the quota API: - To have unified, shared quotas between different

Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)

2011-02-14 Thread Kinuko Yasuda
Some other topics I have not (explicitly) responded yet: On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:32 PM, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com wrote: interface StorageInfo { Should probably be QuotaInfo or even QuotaManager ? Storage can and will be confused with Web Storage. I have no strong opinion here,

Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

2011-02-14 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:15:04 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:28:56 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:

Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

2011-02-14 Thread Simon Pieters
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:59:37 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: In many of these cases other things than programming errors are likely the cause of the error. In most of what you are listing network errors are likely the most common source of errors. Yeah. (I got the list by

[Bug 12067] New: Improve error handling in workers

2011-02-14 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12067 Summary: Improve error handling in workers Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

2011-02-14 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:59:37 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: In many of these cases other things than programming errors are likely the cause of the error. In most of what you are listing network errors are

[Bug 11769] I have just implemented a 'javascript sandbox' using iframes and postMessage, exactly as intended by the specification. Thank you! It works beautifully! Safe XSS at last! Of course, now

2011-02-14 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11769 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 11770] test tx.executeSql(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ToDo, [], function(result){}, function(tx, error){}); tx.executeSql(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ToDo, [], function(result){}, function(tx, error){})

2011-02-14 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11770 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

2011-02-14 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, David Grogan dgro...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org

Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

2011-02-14 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, David Grogan dgro...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:

RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?

2011-02-14 Thread Pablo Castro
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 12:43 PM On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote: From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow Sent:

RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?

2011-02-14 Thread Pablo Castro
(sorry for my random out-of-timing previous email on this thread. please see below for an actually up to date reply) -Original Message- From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 3:31 PM On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org