On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:28:00 +0100, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
The problems I brought up still stand, however. I think we need to have
a discussion about how much convenience the implementers really need
here, and also to look at the impact on the registration procedure for
HTTP
On 22.02.2011 12:52, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:28:00 +0100, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
The problems I brought up still stand, however. I think we need to
have a discussion about how much convenience the implementers really
need here, and also to look at the
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:19:58 +0100, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
wrote:
On 22.02.2011 12:52, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
This is not about convenience for implementors. This is about allowing
specifications to introduce headers that cannot be spoofed via
XMLHttpRequest.
It would be good
- Original Message -
On 2/17/11 2:00 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I think data-urls are allowed to have no content-type. Just like
http
requests can return no content-type header.
A difference is that if HTTP returns no content-type header then the
type is sniffed, whereas a data:
[sorry if this is a repeat, sent first copy in the process of joining the list]
Jumping over to this list (hi, I'm new here!) from another list.
To recap: I had chimed in in support of Mark's proposal, and Anne said It
fails to meet the goal of Sec-, with a pointer to this thread.
It seems
Hi folks,
I am putting together an implementation report for Selectors API, but I
don't have handy access to a copy of Windows/IE9 - if anyone who does has
the couple of minutes needed to visit
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/001.html
(Using IE9 RC1)
On 2/22/11 4:17 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/001.html
100%
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/002.html
100%
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/003.html
I get a 404.
On Feb/22/2011 4:40 PM, ext Mike Taylor wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/003.html
I get a 404.
The above is missing and x and should be:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/003.xhtml
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:40:34 +0100, Mike Taylor miketa...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/003.html
I get a 404.
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/003.xhtml
--
Arve Bersvendsen
Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
* Pablo Castro wrote:
We discussed international language support last time at the TPAC and I
said I'd propose spec text for it. Please find the patch below, the
changes mirror exactly the proposal described in the bug
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
If an exception is unhanded in an IDB event handler, we abort the
transaction. Should we continue firing the other handlers when this
happens,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
If an exception is unhanded in an IDB event handler, we abort the
12 matches
Mail list logo
