On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Brendan Eich
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Darin's position is "leaning toward" not breaking
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Brendan Eich
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Darin's position is "leaning toward" not breaking compatibility with
> what
> >> Chrome has shipped for a while. Th
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>>>
>>> Darin's position is "leaning toward" not breaking compatibility with what
>>> Chrome has shipped for a while. That's one
The public-webapps-testsu...@w3.org list is now operational:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps-testsuite/
Please use this list for WebApps' testing discussions.
To subscribe to this list, send a subscribe e-mail to:
public-webapps-testsuite-requ...@w3.org
For discussions
I have updated WebApps' testing process documents to reflect comments
submitted to the initial draft process [1]. As such, this is a Call for
Consensus to agree to the testing process as described in:
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Submission
htt
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:01 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> Agreed. I certainly don't assert that whatever Chrome ships first should be
> regarded as standard. Our rapid release schedule depends on platform
> features beginning life with a vendor prefix. I believe that we goofed in
> this case by not
On 2011-04-13 06:32, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Lachlan Hunt:
OK. Then I'm not sure what the practical difference between the
Element[] or sequence would be then, nor which one to use.
... the only difference is that with Element[] you can distinguish
between null and an array of [length 0], wh
On 2011-04-13 04:43, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Lachlan Hunt:
This seems to differ from the algorithm given for T[], which
requires that the object be either an array host object or a native
object, which would not handle the JQuery case. The sequence
type seems more generic than that as the algo
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Another advantage of dropping the memory automatically is that you
> don't need to copy any data into the Blob. Instead you can just make
> the Blob take ownership of whatever memory buffers you've built up
> during the various calls to .app
This is a reply to an old message
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/0087.html)
and I don't know if this goes to the right "thread".
Would Server Sent Events be more or less efficient that Web Sockets?
Does one of these use less resources than the other? Or, are the (mo
10 matches
Mail list logo
