Le 10 mai 2011 à 00:18, João Eiras a écrit :
>> I would just model the 'copy' (and 'cut') events exactly as a 'dragstart'
>> event, ideally so much so that you can literally use the same function for
>> both. (Canceling 'cut' would prevent the default deletion of the
>> selection, canceling 'copy
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> This does mean firing tens of thousands of events during load on some pages
> (e.g. wikipedia article edit pages) Maybe that's not a big deal.
If that's too many events, couldn't the browser optimize by not
spellchecking words until they
I think you'd want to push the script-added data regardless of whether the
event is canceled or not. Why would the script add the data otherwise?
I would just model the 'copy' (and 'cut') events exactly as a 'dragstart'
event, ideally so much so that you can literally use the same function for
(Sorry for the long delay in responding to this.)
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:21:35 +0900, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
> > - this seems to support the insertion in the clipboard's data of other
> > types than what is currently commonly supported by bro
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> On 2011-05-07 16:03, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>>
>> (I don't have results for IE yet because the testharness script I used
>> to write the tests doesn't work in IE.)
>
> I've now tested IE9, which did give me results. The following properties
> are
On 5/9/11 3:39 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
* Every time the UA would normally invoke its spellchecker on a word,
it fires a spellcheck event at the element in question
This does mean firing tens of thousands of events during load on some
pages (e.g. wikipedia article edit pages) Maybe that's
2011/5/9 Hironori Bono (坊野 博典) :
> function CheckTextOfNode(node) {
> // Remove all the previous spellchecking results.
> window.spellCheckController.removeMarkers(node);
>
> // Check the text in the specified node.
> var result = CheckText(node.innerText ? node.innerText : node.value);
>
On 5/6/2011 7:07 AM, timeless wrote:
I think that a stored procedure could be considered as a compiled
version of a serialized function. i.e. something which loses its scope
chain, and which loses access to its parent object. If it loses access
to its scope chain which includes the interesting gl
On 2011-05-07 16:03, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
(I don't have results for IE yet because the testharness script I used
to write the tests doesn't work in IE.)
I've now tested IE9, which did give me results. The following
properties are all stringified to "".
* BODY .text, .bgColor, .link, .vLink,
>
> This is the privacy violation, and not acceptable as such.
> I wonder how to not expose native spellchecker data to web page, yet
> support this use case. Or do we need yet another permission, which user
> has to give to the page before the spellchecker API fully working.
>
In general permis
On 05/09/2011 11:58 AM, Hironori Bono (坊野 博典) wrote:
Greetings,
I'm Hironori Bono, a software engineer for Google Chrome.
We recently received requests from web-application developers (and
extension developers) that they would like to use the spellchecker
Quite different targets.
integrated i
Greetings,
I'm Hironori Bono, a software engineer for Google Chrome.
We recently received requests from web-application developers (and
extension developers) that they would like to use the spellchecker
integrated into Google Chrome and to replace the spellchecker with
their spellcheckers implemen
12 matches
Mail list logo
