On Thursday, May 12, 2011, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> Async API:
> IDBObjectStore.openCursor stipulates that "The steps are run with this
> IDBObjectStore as source ..."
> IDBIndex.openCursor stipulates that "The steps are run with this IDBIndex as
> source ..."
> IDBIndex.openKeyCursor stipulates
Async API:
IDBObjectStore.openCursor stipulates that "The steps are run with this
IDBObjectStore as source ..."
IDBIndex.openCursor stipulates that "The steps are run with this IDBIndex as
source ..."
IDBIndex.openKeyCursor stipulates that "The steps are run with this
IDBObjectStore as source ..
2011/5/12 Scott Wilson :
> I'd be tempted to just strip off any trailing slashes on import.
> Actually I might do that for all path components in a WARP origin rather than
> throw an error.
So. I was hoping it could be fixed by Stores when they import, but of
course the signature would be voided
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, timeless wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Marcos Caceres
> wrote:
>> did you just say "the tools will save us?" :)
>
> i did, did!
>
>> It's better to avoid confusion
>> altogether and make this a bit more liberal, me thinks.
>
> i think we risk people t
On 12 May 2011, at 13:43, timeless wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Marcos Caceres
> wrote:
>> did you just say "the tools will save us?" :)
>
> i did, did!
>
>> It's better to avoid confusion
>> altogether and make this a bit more liberal, me thinks.
>
> i think we risk people thin
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Marcos Caceres
wrote:
> did you just say "the tools will save us?" :)
i did, did!
> It's better to avoid confusion
> altogether and make this a bit more liberal, me thinks.
i think we risk people thinking that paths are allowed and meaningful.
i'd rather avoid
2011/5/12 Marcos Caceres :
> The following rule is too restrictive in WARP:
>
> "If origin is not a valid IRI, *if it has components other than scheme
> and iauthority*, if it has no host component, or if it has a iuser
> info component, then this element is in error and the user agent must
> ignor
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Marcos Caceres
wrote:
> On 5/12/11 1:38 PM, timeless wrote:
>>
>> 2011/5/12 Marcos Caceres:
>>>
>>> The following rule is too restrictive in WARP:
>>>
>>> "If origin is not a valid IRI, *if it has components other than scheme
>>> and iauthority*, if it has no host
On 5/12/11 1:38 PM, timeless wrote:
2011/5/12 Marcos Caceres:
The following rule is too restrictive in WARP:
"If origin is not a valid IRI, *if it has components other than scheme
and iauthority*, if it has no host component, or if it has a iuser
info component, then this element is in error an
On 5/12/11 12:41 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 12:27:33 +0200, Marcos Caceres
wrote:
Hi,
The following rule is too restrictive in WARP:
"If origin is not a valid IRI, *if it has components other than scheme
and iauthority*, if it has no host component, or if it has a
On Thu, 12 May 2011 12:27:33 +0200, Marcos Caceres
wrote:
Hi,
The following rule is too restrictive in WARP:
"If origin is not a valid IRI, *if it has components other than scheme
and iauthority*, if it has no host component, or if it has a iuser
info component, then this element is in erro
Hi,
The following rule is too restrictive in WARP:
"If origin is not a valid IRI, *if it has components other than scheme
and iauthority*, if it has no host component, or if it has a iuser
info component, then this element is in error and the user agent must
ignore this element."
For the "if it
Dominique Hazael-Massieux , 2011-05-12 10:41 +0200:
> Since I've received at least one offer to help keeping the page up to
> date if moved to a wiki, I've moved a copy of the document above to the
> wiki page at
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Standards_for_Web_Applications_on_Mobile
>
> In the upcomin
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 16:03 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux a
écrit :
> As part of a European research project I'm involved in [1], I've
> compiled a report on the existing technologies in development (or in
> discussion) at W3C for building Web applications and that are
> particularly releva
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Eric U wrote:
> There are a few things going on here:
yes
> 1) Does the filesystem preserve case? If it's case-sensitive, then
> yes. If it's case-insensitive, then maybe.
> 2) Is it case-sensitive? If not, you have to decide how to do case
> folding, and that
15 matches
Mail list logo