On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote:
10 Garbage collection
If an EventSource object is garbage collected while its connection is
still open, the connection must be closed.
Multiple EventSource instances may share the same underlying connection.
If this happens, and just one
Hi Ian,
tiny quick editorial request, where the spec says:
When the localStorage attribute is accessed, the user agent must run
the following steps:
Can you please change that to:
When the localStorage attribute is accessed, the user agent must run
the origin security check.
And then
Hi,
The current widget URI spec does not work with XHR and hence can't be
used with popular JS libraries like JQuery Mobile. This makes the URI
scheme basically useless for a massive number of use cases.
To fix it, the widget URI spec needs to respond with HTTP responses
when a URI is
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi Marcos - given this spec is in the Candidate Recommendation state, before
a CfC to publish a new LCWD is started, I think it would be helpful if you
provided a list of the changes you propose and a short summary for
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Marcos Caceres wrote:
tiny quick editorial request, where the spec says:
When the localStorage attribute is accessed, the user agent must run
the following steps:
Can you please change that to:
When the localStorage attribute is accessed, the user agent must run
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
Thinking about this more, that port could be sent as the data
attribute of the event instead of the empty string. Then the ports
attribute on MessageEvent could be safely deprecated.
-Ken
So a number of different
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
1) I'm not completely sure I understand what the new postMessage()
semantics
look like. Since cloning a port is a destructive operation, I like the
fact
that the current postMessage() API requires the developer to
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11401
Eliot Graff eliot...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
1) I'm not completely sure I understand what the new postMessage()
semantics
look like. Since cloning a port is a destructive operation, I like the
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Marcos Caceres marcosscace...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The current widget URI spec does not work with XHR and hence can't be
used with popular JS libraries like JQuery Mobile. This makes the URI
scheme basically useless for a massive number of use cases.
Oops :)
The description for the IDBIndex.getKey tells us to use the steps for
retrieving a value from an index as the operation. These steps seem to deal
with how to retrieve values and not keys. It seems, we need a new section
similar to this one that explains how to retrieve a primary key from an
On Jun/9/2011 7:09 PM, ext Rich Tibbett wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Marcos Caceresmarcosscace...@gmail.com wrote:
To fix it, the widget URI spec needs to respond with HTTP responses
when a URI is dereferenced... similar to what blob:// does:
From: Andrew Wilson [mailto:atwil...@google.com]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 2:15 PM
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Jonas Sicking
jo...@sicking.ccmailto:jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Kenneth Russell
k...@google.commailto:k...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at
Honestly, there's something about this whole discussion that just doesn't feel
right.
I looks like we're trying to graft-in this new concept of transfer of ownership
into the existing postMessage semantics (i.e., object cloning). Any way I try
to make it work, it just looks like peaches
14 matches
Mail list logo
