Re: Element.create(): a proposal for more convenient element creation

2011-08-05 Thread Garrett Smith
On 8/4/11, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote: [...] ser-generated function function. The scope of handler attributes is explained in HTML 5, though incompletely: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#event-handler-content-attributes That's incomplete. Correction: It is

Possible errata for http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/

2011-08-05 Thread 陈天舟
Hi there, I have read the spec and I spot one minor issue in the spec: - 3.1.8 Requests. 2nd paragraph. Finally, requests have a request transaction. When a request is created, it is always placed against atransaction using either the steps to a asynchronously execute a request or the steps

Re: publish new WD of DOM Core; deadline August 10

2011-08-05 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:17:30 +0200, David Flanagan dflana...@mozilla.com wrote: On 8/4/11 12:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Alright, how about DOM4? I suspect it is the inclusion of the word core that causes the confusion, not the lack of a version number. If you google dom core you

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:22 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 8/4/11 11:47 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: Several documents in the WebApps Working Group are linking to HTML, more specifically to the WHATWG HTML specification. An example of those is Progress Events. This is done for no

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 8/5/11 8:50 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:22 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 8/4/11 11:47 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: Several documents in the WebApps Working Group are linking to HTML, more specifically to the WHATWG HTML specification. An example of

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:50:35 +0200, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: What does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group? It means we are consistent with their work: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-diff-20110525/#references -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 15:51 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:50:35 +0200, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: What does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group? It means we are consistent with their work:

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? What does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group? There are features in the WHATWG version that got rejected in the HTML Working Group. See

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:32 +, Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? What does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group? There are features in the WHATWG version that got rejected in

[Bug 13065] WindowTimers normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13065 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 13064] WindowBase64 normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13064 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 13063] MessagePort normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13063 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Glenn Adams
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote: On 8/5/11 8:50 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:22 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 8/4/11 11:47 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: Several documents in the WebApps Working Group are

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Marcos Caceres
On 5 Aug 2011, at 14:50, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:22 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 8/4/11 11:47 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: Several documents in the WebApps Working Group are linking to HTML, more specifically to the WHATWG HTML specification. An example

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:32 +, Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? What does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group? There are

[Bug 13675] MessageEvent::ports should be a nullable platform array object for interop

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13675 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13264] please more pics to visually understand. too much reading.

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13264 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13180] [Editorial] Causes that lead to failing the WebSocket connection, which results in an error event, should be more clearly specified

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13180 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13686] New: Either remove the special case from onmessage (to call start()) or add it also to addEventListener listeners

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13686 Summary: Either remove the special case from onmessage (to call start()) or add it also to addEventListener listeners Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: Other

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote: Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? If there is something you need that is not in the W3C spec, then it seems like a valid reason (e.g., PeerConnection API or some helpful concept). Agreed, but no one

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote: Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? If there is something you need that is not in the W3C spec, then it seems like a valid reason

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Arun Ranganathan
On 8/5/11 11:52 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote: Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? If there is something you need that is not in the W3C spec, then it seems like a valid reason (e.g., PeerConnection API or

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Charles Pritchard
On 8/5/2011 9:23 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: It should be left to the editor's (or working group) discretion as to which spec they cite regardless of the reason. And one of the role of the W3C staff is to ensure proper coordination between the various Working Groups at the W3C. I'm

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 13:41 -0400, Arun Ranganathan wrote: On 8/5/11 11:52 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote: Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? If there is something you need that is not in the W3C spec, then

Re: Reference to the HTML specification

2011-08-05 Thread Arun Ranganathan
On 8/5/11 2:19 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 13:41 -0400, Arun Ranganathan wrote: On 8/5/11 11:52 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote: Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? If there is

[Bug 13633] Add high-level overviews to more of the abstract algorithms, like for set the selection's value

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13633 Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13295] The make disappear a WebSocket object case should not fail the WebSocket connection

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13295 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13322] Add UDP! Quake uses UDP, I can't continue development of WebQuake because it uses UDP.

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13322 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13294] The send() method should fail the WebSocket connection when data cannot be sent

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13294 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12574 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 13295] The make disappear a WebSocket object case should not fail the WebSocket connection

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13295 Brian Raymor [MSFT] brian.ray...@microsoft.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug 10930] CanvasPixelArray out of range behavior needs clarification

2011-08-05 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10930 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED