On 8/4/11, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
ser-generated function function.
The scope of handler attributes is explained in HTML 5, though
incompletely:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#event-handler-content-attributes
That's incomplete.
Correction: It is
Hi there,
I have read the spec and I spot one minor issue in the spec:
- 3.1.8 Requests. 2nd paragraph.
Finally, requests have a request transaction. When a request is created, it
is always placed against atransaction using either the steps to a
asynchronously execute a request or the steps
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:17:30 +0200, David Flanagan dflana...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On 8/4/11 12:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Alright, how about DOM4?
I suspect it is the inclusion of the word core that causes the
confusion, not the lack of a version number. If you google dom core
you
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:22 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 8/4/11 11:47 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
Several documents in the WebApps Working Group are linking to HTML, more
specifically to the WHATWG HTML specification. An example of those is
Progress Events. This is done for no
On 8/5/11 8:50 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:22 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 8/4/11 11:47 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
Several documents in the WebApps Working Group are linking to HTML, more
specifically to the WHATWG HTML specification. An example of
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:50:35 +0200, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote:
What does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group?
It means we are consistent with their work:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-diff-20110525/#references
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 15:51 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:50:35 +0200, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote:
What does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group?
It means we are consistent with their work:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? What
does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group? There are features
in the WHATWG version that got rejected in the HTML Working Group. See
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:32 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? What
does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group? There are features
in the WHATWG version that got rejected in
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13065
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13064
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13063
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
On 8/5/11 8:50 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:22 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 8/4/11 11:47 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
Several documents in the WebApps Working Group are
On 5 Aug 2011, at 14:50, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:22 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 8/4/11 11:47 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
Several documents in the WebApps Working Group are linking to HTML, more
specifically to the WHATWG HTML specification. An example
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:32 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version? What
does it mean for the work of the HTML Working Group? There are
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13675
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13264
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13686
Summary: Either remove the special case from onmessage (to call
start()) or add it also to addEventListener listeners
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version?
If there is something you need that is not in the W3C spec, then it seems
like a valid reason (e.g., PeerConnection API or some helpful concept).
Agreed, but no one
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version?
If there is something you need that is not in the W3C spec, then it seems
like a valid reason
On 8/5/11 11:52 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version?
If there is something you need that is not in the W3C spec, then it seems like
a valid reason (e.g., PeerConnection API or
On 8/5/2011 9:23 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
It should be left to the editor's (or working group) discretion as to which
spec they cite regardless of the reason.
And one of the role of the W3C staff is to ensure proper coordination
between the various Working Groups at the W3C. I'm
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 13:41 -0400, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 8/5/11 11:52 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version?
If there is something you need that is not in the W3C spec, then
On 8/5/11 2:19 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 13:41 -0400, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 8/5/11 11:52 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:18 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Again, what are the reasons to link to the WHATWG HTML version?
If there is
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13633
Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13295
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13322
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13295
Brian Raymor [MSFT] brian.ray...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10930
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
32 matches
Mail list logo