Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-15 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Jonas Sicking wrote: >>It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality >>operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator already. > > It's quite normal for object models to not guarantee that "the" equality

Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-15 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: > On 9/9/2011 6:02 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Charles Pritchard  wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Sean Hogan  wrote: >>> On 10/09/11 3:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > It's a complete

Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-15 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:21:53 +0200, Jonas Sicking wrote: It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator already. Except Brainfuck [1]. But the DOM isn't implementable in Brainfuck anyway as it doesn't have objects,

Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5

2011-09-15 Thread Hallvord R. M. Steen
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:51:01 +0200, Glenn Maynard wrote: I'd hoped to see browsers adjust behavior so clipboard copying happens before anything else (before firing DOM events at all), making it more difficult for pages to fiddle with the selection before the copy occurs If we spec'ed that,

DOM4 published ; please use www-dom for related discussions

2011-09-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
DOM4 was published in /TR/ today <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-dom-20110915/>. Please use www-...@w3.org for all DOM4 discussions.

Re: RfC: Is Web Sockets API ready for LC publication? [Was: Re: [websockets] Getting WebSockets API to Last Call]

2011-09-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
As an update on this RfC, note that ATM, 13777 is the only non-editorial bug that remains open: I would appreciate it, if people would please provide input on this bug. -AB On 9/9/11 6:05 PM, ext Brian Raymor wrote: 13777 - The WebSocke

Proposal to add Mouse Lock to the Web Events Working Group

2011-09-15 Thread Vincent Scheib
A Mouse Lock API has been under discussion on the W3 public-webapps list "Mouse Lock"[1] and earlier "Mouse Capture for Canvas"[2]. The primary goal is to enable use cases such as first person perspective 3D applications. This is done by providing scripted access to mouse movement data while locki

Re: [editing] Using public-webapps for editing discussion

2011-09-15 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Since some related functionality was included (at one point) in the HTML5 > spec, it seems like we should ask the HTML WG for feedback on Aryeh's email. > > Aryeh told me there are some related bugs: > >  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_b

[Bug 14067] Value for createLink and unlink can be null instead of a string

2011-09-15 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14067 Aryeh Gregor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 14067] Value for createLink and unlink can be null instead of a string

2011-09-15 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14067 Aryeh Gregor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 14067] Value for createLink and unlink can be null instead of a string

2011-09-15 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14067 Aryeh Gregor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [editing] Using public-webapps for editing discussion

2011-09-15 Thread Charles Pritchard
On 9/15/2011 1:26 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Since some related functionality was included (at one point) in the HTML5 spec, it seems like we should ask the HTML WG for feedback on Aryeh's email. Aryeh told me there are some related bugs: