On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:50:58 +0200, Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a reason that Javascript cannot read the Access-Control-*
headers in CORS?
In particular I was trying to work around a bug in Firefox [1] that
means that .getAllResponseHeaders() doesn't get all response
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:30:24 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov
dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
Further, instead of packaging Web Components into one omnibus
offering, we will likely end up with several free-standing specs or
spec addendums:
1) Shadow DOM, the largest bag of with XBL2's donated organs --
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:52:39 +0200, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
This is our understanding on how the spec needs to change to support the
new WebIDL exception handling model. We would start by removing all of
the constants from IDBDatabaseException. After that, the only
On 09/24/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
Chromium (myself, Rafael Weinstein, Erik Arvidsson, Ryosuke Niwa) and
Mozilla (Olli Pettay, Jonas Sicking) have worked together on a
proposal for a replacement for Mutation Events.
This proposal represents our best attempt to date at making a set of
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:31:36 +0200, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:52:39 +0200, Israel Hilerio
isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
This is our understanding on how the spec needs to change to support
the new WebIDL exception handling model. We would start by
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I agree that there are no legacy requirements on XHR here, however I
don't think that that is the only thing that we should look at. We
should also look
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
Applying all the legacy text/html craziness
Furthermore, applying full legacy text/html craziness involves parser
restarts for GET requests. With a
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14288
Summary: document.documentElement.insertAdjacentHTML specs
WebKit behavior instead of IE behavior
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
I've some strong reservations about expanding the scheme into dns-land.
I''m still looking into this, but I don't know how we get around that. If you
have any suggestions, sure would like to hear them.
On Sep
On Sep 23, 2011, at 18:26 , Mark Baker wrote:
Well, this is progress, but it seems the only difference now between
widget: and http: is the authority. And if that's the case, then
instead of (from your example);
widget://c13c6f30-ce25-11e0-9572-0800200c9a66/index.html
why not go with
On Monday, September 26, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On Sep 23, 2011, at 18:26 , Mark Baker wrote:
Well, this is progress, but it seems the only difference now between
widget: and http: is the authority. And if that's the case, then
instead of (from your example);
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I agree that there are no legacy requirements on XHR here, however I
don't think
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Marcos Caceres
marcosscace...@gmail.com wrote:
There are however many useful benefits in tying a packaged web application
(using whatever packaging) to an origin, not the least of which is
same-origin policy and overall just being a regular web app (that may
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mark Baker dist...@acm.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Marcos Caceres
marcosscace...@gmail.com wrote:
There are however many useful benefits in tying a packaged web application
(using whatever packaging) to an origin, not the least of which is
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:30:24 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org
wrote:
Further, instead of packaging Web Components into one omnibus
offering, we will likely end up with several free-standing specs or
spec
On 09/26/2011 11:47 AM, Olli Pettay wrote:
On 09/24/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
Chromium (myself, Rafael Weinstein, Erik Arvidsson, Ryosuke Niwa) and
Mozilla (Olli Pettay, Jonas Sicking) have worked together on a
proposal for a replacement for Mutation Events.
This proposal represents our
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14296
Summary: sorry, does this work
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#sco
pe-0
On 09/24/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
Chromium (myself, Rafael Weinstein, Erik Arvidsson, Ryosuke Niwa) and
Mozilla (Olli Pettay, Jonas Sicking) have worked together on a
proposal for a replacement for Mutation Events.
This proposal represents our best attempt to date at making a set of
Below is Call for Implementation for the Progress Events spec.
Anne, Ms2ger, what is the status of the Progress Events test suite (e.g.
% complete)?
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/
Original Message
Subject: Progress Events is a W3C Candidate
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 09/24/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
Chromium (myself, Rafael Weinstein, Erik Arvidsson, Ryosuke Niwa) and
Mozilla (Olli Pettay, Jonas Sicking) have worked together on a
proposal for a replacement for Mutation
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 09/24/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
Chromium (myself, Rafael Weinstein, Erik Arvidsson, Ryosuke Niwa) and
Mozilla (Olli Pettay, Jonas Sicking) have worked together on a
proposal for a replacement for Mutation
Thanks Glenn and Simon--I'll see what I can do.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:40:44 +0200, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
BlobBuilder.append(text) says:
Appends the supplied text to the current contents of the
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
native Newlines must be transformed to the default line-ending
representation of the underlying host filesystem. For example, if the
underlying filesystem is FAT32, newlines would be transformed into \r\n
pairs as the text
On 09/26/2011 09:09 PM, Adam Klein wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 09/24/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
Chromium (myself, Rafael Weinstein, Erik Arvidsson, Ryosuke Niwa) and
Mozilla (Olli Pettay, Jonas Sicking) have worked together on a
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:07:12 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
Anne, Ms2ger, what is the status of the Progress Events test suite (e.g.
% complete)?
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/
All features are tested, including some complex Web IDL tests. I think
Hi Marcos,
On Sep 26, 2011, at 16:43 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
Well, the advantage of a scheme is that it's solidly in the realm of the
implementation to decide how to handle it. We've actually been bouncing
ideas like the above
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 09/26/2011 09:09 PM, Adam Klein wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 09/24/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
Chromium (myself, Rafael Weinstein, Erik Arvidsson,
The upcoming TPAC meeting (Oct 31 - Nov 01) provides an opportunity for
joint WG meetings and lots of informal sharing. As such, some groups
make spec publications right before TPAC.
Note there is a 2-week publication blackout period around the TPAC week
and Oct 24 is the last day to request
Though unstable, Chromium via WebKit has introduced an API for working
with storage quotas:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-html5/msg/5261d24266ba4366
In brief:
void queryUsageAndQuota(
unsigned short storageType,
optional StorageInfoUsageCallback
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
Summary: ja sam manijak iz gimnazijskog parka, veÄ danima
sakriven ja gledam te iz mraka
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL:
Please don't use errorCallback/SuccessCallback. That's not used in any
other APIs that are part of the cross-browser web platform. Instead
return a request object on which events are fired.
Don't use enums as the syntax sucks in JS. Use strings instead. We're
making the same transition in a lot
The callback style is prevalent in the File API, as well as IndexedDB. It seems
quite fitting to me. Am I missing something?
They are using vendor prefixing (WebKit).
From what I read, WebSQL is temporary: I've not confirmed this.
I'm super surprised that Chrome treats IDB as temporary. That
On 9/26/11 7:53 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
The callback style is prevalent in the File API...
The enum style is also borrowed from
FileSystem.
Those are totally different things. One of them is much saner than the
other; it's not clear that either one is worth emulating in other specs
in
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
The callback style is prevalent in the File API, as well as IndexedDB. It
seems quite fitting to me. Am I missing something?
They are using vendor prefixing (WebKit).
From what I read, WebSQL is temporary: I've not
On Sep 26, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 9/26/11 7:53 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
The callback style is prevalent in the File API...
The enum style is also borrowed from
FileSystem.
Those are totally different things. One of them is much saner than the
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
What's the alternative to the callback style from the proposal? It should be
async, as both requesting and checking quota may require async requests.
See IDBRequest.
On Monday, September 26, 2011 2:36 AM Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:31:36 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:52:39 +0200, Israel Hilerio
isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
This is our understanding on how the spec needs to change to support
37 matches
Mail list logo
