On 1/9/12 11:12 AM, ext Olli Pettay wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:59 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
As I indicated in [1], WebApps already has a relatively large number of
specs in progress and the group has agreed to add some new specs. As
such, to review any new charter addition proposals, I think we nee
On 01/09/2012 06:17 PM, Young, Milan wrote:
To clarify, are you interested in developing the entirety of the JS API
we developed in the HTML Speech XG, or just the subset proposed by
Google?
Not sure if you sent the reply to me only on purpose.
CCing the WG and XG lists.
Since from practical p
On 01/09/2012 04:59 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi All,
As I indicated in [1], WebApps already has a relatively large number of
specs in progress and the group has agreed to add some new specs. As
such, to review any new charter addition proposals, I think we need at
least the following:
1. Relat
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 16:10 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:25:07 +0200, Vladimir Dzhuvinov
> wrote:
> > Regarding "6. Resource processing model": [item 3] "A list of headers
> > consisting of zero or more header field names that are supported by
> > the resource.":
> >
Hi All,
As I indicated in [1], WebApps already has a relatively large number of
specs in progress and the group has agreed to add some new specs. As
such, to review any new charter addition proposals, I think we need at
least the following:
1. Relatively clear scope of the feature(s). (This
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15470
Summary: Changing the selection creates a Range object
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
querySelector() and querySelectorAll() methods are exciting features, but they
do not allow select _immediate_ children of reference element.
To address this lack, we could use following syntax:
var divs = refElement.querySelectorAll('> DIV');
Here 'divs' variable contains list of DIV eleme
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:57:33 +0100, Ojan Vafai wrote:
BCC: whatwg, CC:public-webapps since discussion of the editing spec has
moved
I'm OK with this conclusion, but I still strongly prefer "div" to be the
"default single-line container name".
Why?
Also, I'd really like the "default
single-