[Bug 16534] New: give me a demo on php pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

2012-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16534 Summary: give me a demo on php please! Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top

Re: Where should UA insert text when the focus is changed in a keypress event handler?

2012-03-27 Thread Hallvord R. M. Steen
Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org skreiv Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:54:11 +0100 We're trying to figure out inside which element the editing operation must be done when a keypress event handler changes the focused element / selection for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81661. Should it be done

Re: StreamBuilder threshold

2012-03-27 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Feras Moussa fer...@microsoft.com wrote: This isn't clear from the spec (And I've made a note to clarify it) but URLs for streams should be one time use URLs (once used it should be automatically revoked). Is it always possible to define that in a sane

Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal

2012-03-27 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: Anything's possible, but I think the pain here would far outweigh the benefits. There would be some really hard questions to answer, too (e.g. what would

Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal

2012-03-27 Thread Bronislav Klučka
On 27.3.2012 11:43, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch mailto:i...@hixie.ch wrote: Anything's possible, but I think the pain here would far outweigh the

[Bug 16534] give me a demo on php pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

2012-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16534 Art Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Web Workers; deadline April 3

2012-03-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
Original Message Subject:RfC: LCWD of Web Workers; deadline April 3 Resent-Date:Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:34:30 + Resent-From:public-webapps@w3.org Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:33:38 -0400 From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com To: public-webapps

Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Web Workers; deadline April 3

2012-03-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
Original Message Subject:RfC: LCWD of Web Workers; deadline April 3 Resent-Date:Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:34:30 + Resent-From:public-webapps@w3.org Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:33:38 -0400 From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com To: public-webapps

[no subject]

2012-03-27 Thread joseph godwin
l cannot access google apps business, l try to check my domain but not responding and it bring out all these Can't connect to server:[Exception... "Not enough arguments [nsIXMLHttpRequest.send]" nsresult: "0x80570001 (NS_ERROR_XPC_NOT_ENOUGH_ARGS)" location: "JS frame ::

[xhr] statusText is underdefined

2012-03-27 Thread Boris Zbarsky
The spec says: Return the HTTP status text. But the HTTP status text is a sequence of bytes, while the return value for statusText is a DOMString. The conversion from one to the other needs to be defined. -Boris

Re: HELP

2012-03-27 Thread Charles Pritchard
Wrong list. But for the sake of web crawlers: send may require an argument in some implementations. Use null. Such as: xhr.send(null); And for other readers, this message I'm replying to may be spam. Intelligent noise. -Charles On Mar 27, 2012, at 1:15 AM, joseph godwin

Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined

2012-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams
Is this really a problem? HTTP defines the form and encoding of the status text, and WebIDL/ES defines the form and encoding of DOMString. Adding an explicit conversion definition seems redundant and overspecified. I would argue the same for all other cases in the spec where it calls out an

Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined

2012-03-27 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 3/27/12 2:46 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: Is this really a problem? Yes. We've run into bug reports in the past of sites sending some pretty random bytes in the HTTP status text, then reading .statusText from script. If we want interop here, we need to define the conversion. HTTP defines

Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined

2012-03-27 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 3/27/12 3:35 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: The TEXT rule is only used for descriptive field contents and values that are not intended to be interpreted by the message parser. Words of *TEXT MAY contain characters from character sets other than ISO- 8859-1 [22] only when encoded

Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined

2012-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 3/27/12 2:46 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: Is this really a problem? Yes. We've run into bug reports in the past of sites sending some pretty random bytes in the HTTP status text, then reading .statusText from script. If

Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined

2012-03-27 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 3/27/12 3:36 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 3/27/12 3:35 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: The TEXT rule is only used for descriptive field contents and values that are not intended to be interpreted by the message parser. Words of *TEXT MAY contain characters from character sets other than ISO- 8859-1

Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined

2012-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 3/27/12 3:36 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 3/27/12 3:35 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: The TEXT rule is only used for descriptive field contents and values that are not intended to be interpreted by the message parser. Words

Re: [xhr] statusText is underdefined

2012-03-27 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 3/27/12 4:00 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: Since there are so may places in XHR, HTML5, etc., that interact with HTTP semantics, it would be better to define this in one place for all uses Sounds good to me. It just needs to be defined (and the definition linked to from the statusText

File API oneTimeOnly is too poorly defined

2012-03-27 Thread Glenn Maynard
I didn't realize this was actually added to the spec: The optional options dictionary argument contains a key, oneTimeOnly that defaults to false. If set to true, then the first time the Blob URI is dereferenced, user agents MUST automatically revoke that Blob URI without needing a call to

[Bug 8406] Stricter Specifications on Mouse Events Specifically primary, auxillary, and secondary default actions

2012-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8406 Sirisian warcraftthre...@sbcglobal.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|REOPENED

Re: Feedback requested for UndoManager and DOM Transaction

2012-03-27 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
Hi, I've moved my draft to W3C repository at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/undomanager/raw-file/tip/undomanager.html At this point, I'd like the editing community group to be in charge of this proposal. - Ryosuke On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: Greetings all,