https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16303
Anne ann...@opera.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:06:07 +0200, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
I might argue that we shouldn't have ArrayBuffer entry points at all;
just ArrayBufferView. It's trivial to create a view on the whole of an
ArrayBuffer, and this is leading towards us having two separate entry
points for
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:57:23 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Apologies if this has been discussed before and I missed it, or have
forgotten about it.
It has been discussed before. I think last time this came up I was
wondering why we needed these various options for what to do
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16707
Summary: user/password set to undefined means missing
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:43:20 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 4/11/12 12:26 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
That's not correct. For nullable types, ES undefined is converted to IDL
null per step 3 of
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#es-nullable-type. There's some
extra complexity
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16303
Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:57:23 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Apologies if this has been discussed before and I missed it, or have
forgotten about it.
It has been discussed before. I think last time this
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16303
Anne ann...@opera.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16708
Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||public-webapps@w3.org
In December, Google proposed [1] to public-webapps a Speech JavaScript
API that subset supports the majority of the use-cases in the Speech
Incubator Group's Final Report. This proposal provides a programmatic
API that enables web-pages to synthesize speech output and to use
speech recognition as
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:30, Hans Wennborg hwennb...@google.com wrote:
We welcome discussion and feedback on this editor's draft. Please send
your comments to the public-speech-api-cont...@w3.org mailing list.
Correction: please send your comments to the public-speech-...@w3.org
mailing list.
Original Message
Subject:RfC: LCWD of Widget Updates; deadline April 19
Resent-Date:Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:49:25 +
Resent-From:public-native-web-a...@w3.org
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:48:37 -0400
From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
Reply-To:
Hello
I ask you about some new functions in IndexedDB API, which
are extremely needed:
1. How much space available for adding
2. Request user for more space
As I know now limit for IndexedDB in most browsers is about 50 Mb, but it
is not possible to know how much space used, so how much place
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
NEW: If the optionalParameters parameter is specified,
and autoIncrement is
set to true, and the keyPath parameter is specified to the empty string,
or
specified to an Array, this function must throw
a
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16715
Summary: IndexedDB: Spec nit in steps for evaluating key path
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Glenn Maynard wrote:
That's not really what happens, though. WebSocket gives you an ArrayBuffer
if the source is an ArrayBuffer, and a Blob if the source was a Blob
No, at the protocol level they are indistinguishable, and at the API
level the receiver decides which to
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Glenn Maynard wrote:
That's not really what happens, though. WebSocket gives you an
ArrayBuffer
if the source is an ArrayBuffer, and a Blob if the source was a Blob
No, at the protocol level they are
This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
-Boris
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:26:24 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
Why are we still discussing BlobBuilder? I thought we discussed long ago
it should be removed
On 4/12/12 3:44 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:26:24 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
Why are we still discussing BlobBuilder?
Because
On 4/12/12 3:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Blob with constructor is in http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/
Right. I'd ended up at the File Writer spec.
I thought the idea was to not have BlobBuilder at all.
Dunno. Is there content depending on it?
-Boris
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:58:00 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 4/12/12 3:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I thought the idea was to not have BlobBuilder at all.
Dunno. Is there content depending on it?
Maybe some browser specific demos or content, it's not implemented by
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:48:12 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Because it's still in the current editor's draft and it's still in the
Gecko code and I was just reviewing a patch to it and saw the API? ;)
23 matches
Mail list logo
