On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:09 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
> I like the idea. This would be useful for various things, especially if we
> could integrate the discovery and selection of this feature (the local proxy
> Web service) through Web Intents.
I don't understand how Web Intents would be us
I like the idea. This would be useful for various things, especially if we
could integrate the discovery and selection of this feature (the local proxy
Web service) through Web Intents.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan
On May 4, 2012, at 6:48 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:12 A
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> An idea I was kicking around for this would be to simplify the three
> points above to instead have just a way to declare a JS file as being a
> local interceptor, and then have that JS file be automatically launched in
> a worker thread, and t
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Israel Hilerio
>> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, May 03, 2012 3:30 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 03, 2012 3:30 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > The issue of bug 14404 came up at the
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Thursday, May 03, 2012 3:30 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > The issue of bug 14404 came up at the WebApps face-to-face today. I
>> > believe it's now the only remaini
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 3:30 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The issue of bug 14404 came up at the WebApps face-to-face today. I
> > believe it's now the only remaining non-editorial bug. Since we've
> > tried to fix this bug a
On Fri, 4 May 2012, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
> >
> > So what happens in browsers that don't support components? Or in
> > search engines or other data analysis tools that are trying to extract
> > the semantics from the page?
>
> Elements with custom tag-names would have EXACTLY SAME s
> So what happens in browsers that don't support components? Or in search
> engines or other data analysis tools that are trying to extract the
> semantics from the page?
Elements with custom tag-names would have EXACTLY SAME semantic (as for core
HTML5 semantics) meaning as a common container (S
On Fri, 4 May 2012, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
>
> Instead, they have _local_ semantics which purpose is known exclusively
> for document author/scripts and/or consumers of the document. No any
> "fallbacks" needed here at all.
So what happens in browsers that don't support components?
I noticed this yesterday:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#dfn-NotReadableError
the NotReadableError is defined as:
If the File or Blob cannot be read, typically due due to permission problems
that occur after a reference to a File or Blob has been acquired (e.g.
concurrent lock with a
FYI: I buffed up the explainer to conform to PubRules:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/explainer/index.html
:DG<
Ian, it seems you are continuing to confuse two very different things:
1. local semantics;
2. extending existing elements.
They have completely different purposes. Web-developers generally do not need
to _extend_ existing elements (purpose of such extending itself is quite
mysterious for me).
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16930
Art Barstow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16931
Art Barstow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16932
Art Barstow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16933
Art Barstow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16934
Art Barstow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
>>
>> Custom tags vs. "is" attribute
>> - "is" attribute is awkward, overly verbose
>> - custom tags introduce local semantics
>> - perhaps start with something as simple as reserving "x-" prefix on
>>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16933
Summary: In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed
that for how many months always asking my self what
can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im
not exp
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16932
Summary: In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed
that for how many months always asking my self what
can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im
not exp
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16934
Summary: In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed
that for how many months always asking my self what
can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im
not exp
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16931
Summary: In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed
that for how many months always asking my self what
can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im
not exp
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16930
Summary: I don't like public data
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
OS/Version: other
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16927
Summary: HTML reference was changed from W3C version to WHATWG
version
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/websockets/#refe
Glenn, all of your points apply well to pressure sensitive pen input.
Pen vendors are not on the list, but their devices are quite similar.
I've changed the subject line and my responses are to your gamepad notes
in respect to their application to pen input.
Pen input in this case is pressure s
26 matches
Mail list logo
