On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:35:58 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann
wrote:
* Ojan Vafai wrote:
This confusion seems to come up a lot since DOM is part of
public-webapps
but uses a separate mailing list. Maybe it's time to reconsider that
decision? It's the editors of the specs who have the largest say he
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Perhaps lost among other updates was the fact that I've gotten the
> > > first draft of HTML Templates spec out:
> > >
> > > http://dvcs
* Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>At this stage, we should be able to publish v1 as a revised CR, or
>possibly move it up to PR. We can also publish v2. as a new WD.
It does not seem that additional implementation experience is required
to make sure no major changes are needed, so, Proposed Recommendation.
Original Message
Subject:RfC: LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline June 21
Resent-Date:Thu, 24 May 2012 17:21:06 +
Resent-From:
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:20:20 -0400
From: ext Arthur Barstow
To: public-webapps
This is a Request for Comments re the 2
Hi,
I have updated the specification for Selectors API Level 1, which is
currently in CR.
Most of it was editorial in nature, to bring it in line with Selectors
API Level 2, except without adding any of the new features like
findAll() or or matches().
Importantly, the IDL has now been updat
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17486
Ms2ger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17485
Ms2ger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
