Hey,
while reading http://www.w3.org/TR/quota-api/#quota-handling-in-storage-apiI
wondered what the desired behavior was when the UA refuses to grant
any
quota? I think it would be nice to specify this in the standard.
E.g. currently WebKit will throw a QuotaExceeded exception when a page
tries t
(Replying to a message I got separately)
Thanks for the feedback!
Hmm if a write fails because the UA does not grant any quota for the site I
think it must throw a QuotaExceeded exception, so that website authors or
the users could tell how they can re-enable writing to the storage (e.g. by
allow
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17685
Summary: Hello, Please make the standard web socket api include
a spec for an in browser "listener" socket. Meaning: a
javascript application is able to create a server
liste
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17681
Summary: [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions
types should define order
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Sta
Apologies for not responding sooner. I've been swamped on a couple of projects.
I'm happy to do the lion's share of the clerical work for going through the
comments and tracking them. I created a tracking sheet [1] when I put together
the LCWD and will add items to that. Israel and I will meet l
I have now generated a new implementation report [1] to go with the
updated testsuite.
As I detailed previously on public-webapps-testsuite [2], the new tests
use testharness.js and, as a result, some of the tests which passed
under the old framework now fail in some browsers. This is mostly
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
Summary: Parameters to slice
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Fi
