Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests

2012-09-12 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote: I'm sorry this thread has taken too long. I've lost all context. If you'd like to continue this discussion, we'll likely need to start again. My main reaction to what you've written is that Chromium's network stack is

[Bug 18852] New: FileList says it's a Collection but that doesn't make sense

2012-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18852 Summary: FileList says it's a Collection but that doesn't make sense Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW

RE: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request

2012-09-12 Thread Mike Wilson
Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Mike Wilson mike...@hotmail.com wrote: Thanks. So I understand it is the HTML specification reference that provides details on this behaviour for the XHR spec. I'll look further there as its fetching section by itself doesn't

Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request

2012-09-12 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Mike Wilson mike...@hotmail.com wrote: On the other hand, in: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785243 Firefox implementors say that: sync XHR spins the event loop, so events (including async script execution and whatnot) can fire under a sync

Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests

2012-09-12 Thread Adam Barth
I certainly agree that we should define these things clearly. :) Adam On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote: I'm sorry this thread has taken too long. I've lost all context. If you'd

Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request

2012-09-12 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 9/12/12 7:35 PM, Mike Wilson wrote: On the other hand, in: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785243 Firefox implementors say that: sync XHR spins the event loop, so events (including async script execution and whatnot) can fire under a sync XHR call. That's a comment about