[admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15

2012-09-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The upcoming TPAC meeting week (Oct 29-Nov2) provides an opportunity for joint WG meetings and lots of informal information sharing. As such, it can be useful to make new publications before TPAC. There is a publication blackout period around TPAC and Oct 23 is the last day to request

Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15

2012-09-26 Thread Vincent Scheib
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: The upcoming TPAC meeting week (Oct 29-Nov2) provides an opportunity for joint WG meetings and lots of informal information sharing. As such, it can be useful to make new publications before TPAC. There is a

[pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]

2012-09-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/26/12 11:46 AM, ext Vincent Scheib wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: * Pointer Lock - Vincent - what's the status of the spec and its implementation? Firefox 14 and Chrome 22 shipped Pointer Lock implementations to stable channel users

RE: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15

2012-09-26 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Hi Art, We've previously called for any comments to the current Push API draft [1], and would like to promote it to FPWD before TPAC. We haven't received any substantive comments as far as I know, which tells me that it could be in good shape for publication. With the addition of Telefonica

[push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]

2012-09-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/26/12 1:49 PM, ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: We've previously called for any comments to the current Push API draft [1], and would like to promote it to FPWD before TPAC. We haven't received any substantive comments as far as I know, which tells me that it could be in good shape for

Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]

2012-09-26 Thread Vincent Scheib
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: On 9/26/12 11:46 AM, ext Vincent Scheib wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: * Pointer Lock - Vincent - what's the status of the spec and its implementation? Firefox

Re: Sandboxed Filesystem use cases? (was Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?)

2012-09-26 Thread Eric U
Asking about use cases that can be served by a filesystem API, but not by IDB, is reasonable [and I'll respond to it below], but it misses a lot of the point. The users I've talked to like the FS API because it's a simple interface that everyone already understands, that's powerful enough to

RE: [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]

2012-09-26 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Thanks for the feedback, Art. I've responded below. I will work on a new draft to address as many of your comments as I can. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT +1-425-580-6514 -Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday,