On 27 sep 2012 at 05:51:51, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Art. I've responded below. I will work on a new
draft to address as many of your comments as I can.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT
+1-425-580-6514
Arthur Barstow wrote on September 26, 2012
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Can I take this as Chrome being interested in implementing the chunked
proposal as well?
Will have to get back to you on this, since I am mostly
http://odinho.html5.org/IndexedDB/spec/Overview.html
Like I said, I think it's too late to make such a big change. I
believe it's much too late to make such a change in IE10, and we have
been shipping Firefox with the current behavior for quite a while now
(and are about to unprefix
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Can I take this as Chrome being interested in implementing the chunked
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I do somewhat agree that if we had a full stream solution in the
form of a Stream primitive and .responseType=stream, then a better
solution might be to use that in combination with having chunked
delivery on the Stream
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:47 AM, João Eiras jo...@opera.com wrote:
http://odinho.html5.org/IndexedDB/spec/Overview.html
Like I said, I think it's too late to make such a big change. I
believe it's much too late to make such a change in IE10, and we have
been shipping Firefox with the
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I do somewhat agree that if we had a full stream solution in the
form of a Stream primitive and .responseType=stream, then a better
solution might
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com] On
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
It hasn't been updated in a while, but we're still keen on seeing it
move forward AFAIK:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
In my observation of the current IE behavior, the Stream is for download
only. XHR gets the data from the server and buffers it. The consumer of the
stream then pulls data as needed which is extracted from
Hi All,
The current Editors of the DOM4 spec are not interested in moving that
spec toward Recommendation (in the context of WebApps WG). Consequently,
we need an Editor(s) to work on the DOM4 Recommendation track document.
If you are interested in this Editor position and have relevant
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com]
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
In my observation of the current IE behavior, the Stream is for download
only. XHR gets the data from the server and buffers it. The
Earlier today the W3C announced:
[[
... the advancement of Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML
Configuration (Second Edition) to Proposed Edited Recommendation
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PER-widgets-20120925/
This second edition incorporates all known errata as of the publication
On 9/27/12 9:35 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
W3C Advisory Committee members are asked to Please review the
specification and indicate whether you endorse it as W3C Recommendation
or object to its advancement by completing the following questionnaire
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com]
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
In my observation of the current IE behavior,
It is worth noting that this is a critical path blocker for publishing
HTML5 as a REC.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
Hi All,
The current Editors of the DOM4 spec are not interested in moving that
spec toward Recommendation (in the context of
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18749
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
16 matches
Mail list logo