RE: [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]

2012-09-27 Thread EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
On 27 sep 2012 at 05:51:51, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: Thanks for the feedback, Art. I've responded below. I will work on a new draft to address as many of your comments as I can. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT +1-425-580-6514 Arthur Barstow wrote on September 26, 2012

Re: [XHR] chunked

2012-09-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: Can I take this as Chrome being interested in implementing the chunked proposal as well? Will have to get back to you on this, since I am mostly

Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error

2012-09-27 Thread João Eiras
http://odinho.html5.org/IndexedDB/spec/Overview.html Like I said, I think it's too late to make such a big change. I believe it's much too late to make such a change in IE10, and we have been shipping Firefox with the current behavior for quite a while now (and are about to unprefix

Re: [XHR] chunked

2012-09-27 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: Can I take this as Chrome being interested in implementing the chunked

Re: [XHR] chunked

2012-09-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: I do somewhat agree that if we had a full stream solution in the form of a Stream primitive and .responseType=stream, then a better solution might be to use that in combination with having chunked delivery on the Stream

Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error

2012-09-27 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:47 AM, João Eiras jo...@opera.com wrote: http://odinho.html5.org/IndexedDB/spec/Overview.html Like I said, I think it's too late to make such a big change. I believe it's much too late to make such a change in IE10, and we have been shipping Firefox with the

Re: [XHR] chunked

2012-09-27 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: I do somewhat agree that if we had a full stream solution in the form of a Stream primitive and .responseType=stream, then a better solution might

RE: [XHR] chunked

2012-09-27 Thread Travis Leithead
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com] On On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: It hasn't been updated in a while, but we're still keen on seeing it move forward AFAIK:

Re: [XHR] chunked

2012-09-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: In my observation of the current IE behavior, the Stream is for download only. XHR gets the data from the server and buffers it. The consumer of the stream then pulls data as needed which is extracted from

[admin] Call for Editor for DOM4 REC track spec

2012-09-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, The current Editors of the DOM4 spec are not interested in moving that spec toward Recommendation (in the context of WebApps WG). Consequently, we need an Editor(s) to work on the DOM4 Recommendation track document. If you are interested in this Editor position and have relevant

RE: [XHR] chunked

2012-09-27 Thread Travis Leithead
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com] On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: In my observation of the current IE behavior, the Stream is for download only. XHR gets the data from the server and buffers it. The

[widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation

2012-09-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
Earlier today the W3C announced: [[ ... the advancement of Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) to Proposed Edited Recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PER-widgets-20120925/ This second edition incorporates all known errata as of the publication

Re: [widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation

2012-09-27 Thread Tobie Langel
On 9/27/12 9:35 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: W3C Advisory Committee members are asked to Please review the specification and indicate whether you endorse it as W3C Recommendation or object to its advancement by completing the following questionnaire

Re: [XHR] chunked

2012-09-27 Thread Wenbo Zhu
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com] On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: In my observation of the current IE behavior,

Re: [admin] Call for Editor for DOM4 REC track spec

2012-09-27 Thread Glenn Adams
It is worth noting that this is a critical path blocker for publishing HTML5 as a REC. On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote: Hi All, The current Editors of the DOM4 spec are not interested in moving that spec toward Recommendation (in the context of

[Bug 18749] Why removing exception throwing from binaryType

2012-09-27 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18749 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED