Without checking (I'm waiting for the bus in the rain) I can say we also do it
like this. It is actually in the spec if you read it dead carefully, it's just
not that obvious.
It will first do the range getting, and then it will take the item on top
sorted secondarily by value. And in an index
So, at work and with the spec in front of me :-)
Odin claimed:
There is a note near the algorithm saying something to that point, but
the definite text is up in the prose let's explain IDB section IIRC.
Nope, this was wrong, it's actually right there in the algorithm:
In
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
section 4.4.1 says: The interface object for a given non-callback
interface is a function object.
section 4 says: If an object is defined to be a function object, then
it has characteristics as follows: Its [[Prototype]] internal property
is the Function
Hi Philippe,
On 10/03/2012 05:43 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
In
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
section 4.4.1 says: The interface object for a given non-callback
interface is a function object.
section 4 says: If an object is defined to be a function object, then
it has
On 10/3/12 11:43 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
In
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
section 4.4.1 says: The interface object for a given non-callback
interface is a function object.
section 4 says: If an object is defined to be a function object, then
it has characteristics as follows:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com wrote:
So, at work and with the spec in front of me :-)
Odin claimed:
There is a note near the algorithm saying something to that point, but
the definite text is up in the prose let's explain IDB section IIRC.
Nope,
Dimitri would like to publish a new Working Draft of Shadow DOM and this
is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following document as the
basis
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/publish/shadow/index.html.
Agreement to this proposal: a) indicates support for publishing a
