On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Cyril Concolato
cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote:
Hi all,
Reading the File API, it is not clear to me what the behavior is when
reading partial Blob data. The spec says:
Partial Blob data is the part of the File or Blob that has been read into
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
I think HTML should maintain the registry and policy for on*
attributes insofar they concern Window/Document/HTMLElement objects.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
I think HTML should maintain the registry and policy for on*
attributes
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
This seems like a weird case to optimize for. Refactoring the whole
event system implementation isn't something that implementors are
going to do very often. Much less often than implementing new
specifications hopefully.
Hi Jonas,
Le 1/18/2013 11:14 AM, Jonas Sicking a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Cyril Concolato
cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote:
Hi all,
Reading the File API, it is not clear to me what the behavior is when
reading partial Blob data. The spec says:
Partial Blob data is
On 1/18/13 5:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I'm not sure that
though that all the splintering is useful long term as you lose track
of what is going on.
This is actually a fairly serious concern, to be honest. When I was
recently working on WebIDL bindings for document, I ended up with
This is a WG-wide Request for Review [RfR] for all of the tests Ms2ger
and Samsung submitted for the Progress Events CR [CR]:
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Samsung/
Jungkee noted in the e-mail
