Hell yes!!! +1000 to add an interface to inotify :-D
I'm concerned that you're taking this API too far. What's next -
mmaping a file to a byte array?
It would be cool... :-P
Ok, let's get serious. Maybe inotify would be too high level API and I
agree it would be moved to a later version,
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
To clarify, I am proposing that we make a simple app manifest entry the only
requirement for widget declaration: widget: { launch_path: ... }. The issue
with viewMode (https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/22), is that it
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:44:56 +0200, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
To clarify, I am proposing that we make a simple app manifest entry the
only requirement for widget declaration: widget: { launch_path: ... }.
OK. In Opera
Hi Marcos,
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, JC Verdié wrote:
Hi Daniel
While widgets were (unfortunately) not widely adopted, a few companies
(including mine) are using it and it does the job for many simple
issues. It's true that the complexity of the spec vs the
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, JC Verdié wrote:
Hi Marcos,
Obviously as you point out, digsig were a nightmare. May be it was us,
but the spec was not really straightforward to implement and we found it
difficult.
As lead Editor, I'm really very sorry about this - I strive
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, JC Verdié wrote:
Hi Marcos,
Obviously as you point out, digsig were a nightmare. May be it was us,
but the spec was not really straightforward to implement and we found it
difficult.
As lead Editor, I'm really very sorry about
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 2:29 PM, JC Verdié wrote:
Right, but this is a platform/system issue (how events traverse through the
system). This was outside the scope of the work.
Agreed. But it's been a hurdle and I don't know how many companies just
gave up about widgets
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
To clarify, I am proposing that we make a simple app manifest entry the
only requirement for widget declaration: widget: { launch_path: ... }. The
issue with
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
So, I guess the thing would be to try to quickly dig up a few of the old
sites that are using view mode media feature targeted at presto and see if
they have a separate page or if they use the same page. That should at least
be
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com
(mailto:w...@marcosc.com) wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
To clarify, I am proposing that we make a simple app
10 matches
Mail list logo
