On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Marcos Caceres (mailto:w...@marcosc.com)> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
> >
> > > To clarify, I am proposing that we make a simple app manifest en
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> So, I guess the thing would be to try to quickly dig up a few of the old
> sites that are using view mode media feature targeted at presto and see if
> they have a separate page or if they use the same page. That should at least
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
>
> > To clarify, I am proposing that we make a simple app manifest entry the
> only requirement for widget declaration: widget: { launch_path: ... }. The
> issue with viewMode (
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 2:29 PM, JC Verdié wrote:
> >
> > Right, but this is a platform/system issue (how events traverse through the
> > system). This was outside the scope of the work.
>
> Agreed. But it's been a hurdle and I don't know how many companies just
> gave up about widge
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, JC Verdié wrote:
Hi Marcos,
Obviously as you point out, digsig were a nightmare. May be it was us,
but the spec was not really straightforward to implement and we found it
difficult.
As lead Editor, I'm really very sorry about t
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, JC Verdié wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
> Obviously as you point out, digsig were a nightmare. May be it was us,
> but the spec was not really straightforward to implement and we found it
> difficult.
As lead Editor, I'm really very sorry about this - I stri
Hi Marcos,
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, JC Verdié wrote:
Hi Daniel
While widgets were (unfortunately) not widely adopted, a few companies
(including mine) are using it and it does the job for many simple
issues. It's true that the complexity of the spec vs the s
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:44:56 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
To clarify, I am proposing that we make a simple app manifest entry the
only requirement for widget declaration: widget: { launch_path: ... }.
OK. In Opera we did this with
On Monday, July 22, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
> To clarify, I am proposing that we make a simple app manifest entry the only
> requirement for widget declaration: widget: { launch_path: ... }. The issue
> with viewMode (https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/22), is that it
> h
>> Hell yes!!! +1000 to add an interface to inotify :-D
> I'm concerned that you're taking this API too far. What's next -
> mmaping a file to a byte array?
It would be cool... :-P
Ok, let's get serious. Maybe inotify would be too high level API and I
agree it would be moved to a later versio
10 matches
Mail list logo