https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23900
Bug ID: 23900
Summary: WebRTC DataChannels are not called out as
producers/consumers
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
On Nov 23, 2013 2:04 PM, "David Bruant" wrote:
>
> Le 22/11/2013 03:33, Jonas Sicking a écrit :
>>
>> We could enable sync IO APIs in workers while still allowing the
>> worker thread to remain responsive to messages from the main thread.
>> One solution is the API in [2]. Using that API the main
Le 22/11/2013 03:33, Jonas Sicking a écrit :
We could enable sync IO APIs in workers while still allowing the
worker thread to remain responsive to messages from the main thread.
One solution is the API in [2]. Using that API the main thread can
send a error-response to a sync request for IO befo
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
>
> It would technically be possible to define that
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> At the very least, I would like to see a way to write your
> HTML-importable document as a module. So that it runs in a separate
> global and that the caller can access exported symbols and grab the
> ones that it wants.
We had a brain-storm
I asked for this several months ago on the W3C public-WebRTC mail list (
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!msg/discuss-webrtc/1hnewM6xxf8/nzNg6tcxC6wJ),
and the final answer was that we should wait until the specification
was
more stable before going into more problems. Since now Chrome & Firefox
