Here is my understanding:
Firefox has already shipped
Hi everyone,
First time caller, long time listener.
>From what I understand, the browser vendors seem to be bundling
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
>> This could be done by having the element attempt check for a
>> .formData property on any descendant that was added, and add any
>> elements that has such a property as a participant automatically.
>
> That doesn't handle this case:
>
>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24616
Morrita Hajime changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
From: Jonas Sicking
> I'm not sure if we should return a dictionary or an array. Keep in mind that
> a form control can have multiple values. This is something used by both
> and . Also keep in mind that order matters
> as many servers are sensitive to order.
I wonder if the existing `FormDa
Hi Jonas,
You wrote:
> I'm not sure if we should return a dictionary or an array.
Yeah, it should be an array.
> The other thing is that it would be great if elements that wanted to
> participate in submission didn't have to manually call addParticipant.
Yes.
> This could be done by having th
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24756
Bug ID: 24756
Summary: [imports]: Cascading order for stylesheets of imported
documents should be stated more clearly
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
> +public-webapps, -www-tag in replies to avoid cross-posting
>
> Hi,
>
> Domenic wrote, to www-tag:
>
>> [C]an shadow DOM be used to explain existing elements, like or
>> , in terms of a lower-level primitive?
>>
>> As of now, it seems like
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
>
> +public-webapps, -www-tag in replies to avoid cross-posting
>
> Hi,
>
> Domenic wrote, to www-tag:
>
>> [C]an shadow DOM be used to explain existing elements, like or
>> , in terms of a lower-level primitive?
>>
>> As of now, it seem
+public-webapps, -www-tag in replies to avoid cross-posting
Hi,
Domenic wrote, to www-tag:
> [C]an shadow DOM be used to explain existing elements, like or
> , in terms of a lower-level primitive?
>
> As of now, it seems like it cannot, for two reasons:
>
> 1. Native elements have extra capabil
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24704
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@hixie.ch,
On 2/20/2014 1:35 PM, Brandon Jones wrote:
> I've been working with the Gamepad API implementation in Chrome
> recently, trying to bring it up-to-date with the latest editors draft
> of the spec
> (https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gamepad/raw-file/default/gamepad.html). While
> generally I feel like it's a g
I've been working with the Gamepad API implementation in Chrome recently,
trying to bring it up-to-date with the latest editors draft of the spec (
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gamepad/raw-file/default/gamepad.html). While
generally I feel like it's a good update to the working draft I'm puzzled
by the d
13 matches
Mail list logo
