Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive

On 02/02/2015 09:22 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: Brian recently posted what looks like an excellent framing of the composition problem: https://briankardell.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/friendly-fire-the-fog-of-dom/ This is the problem we solved with Shadow DOM and the problem I would like to see s

RE: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 4 February at 22:00Z for 60 minutes

Possible regrets overseas * katie *   Katie Haritos-Shea Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)   Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryla...@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 -Original Message- From: Janina Sajka [mailto:jan...@rednote.net] Sent: Mon

PSA: publishing new WD of Service Workers on February 5

The Service Workers editors - which now includes Jake Archibald (thanks Jake!) - would like to publish a new WD of Service Workers and the proposed publication date is February 5: If anyone has an

Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Olli Pettay wrote: > On 02/02/2015 09:22 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > >> Brian recently posted what looks like an excellent framing of the >> composition problem: >> >> https://briankardell.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/ >> friendly-fire-the-fog-of-dom/ >> >> This is th

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

> > Why don't we just make all input elements support these new attributes > we're adding? In my opinion, I'd say because you can't possibly cover every case - what about doing the same kind of formatting for social security numbers, credit card numbers, phone numbers, or who knows what else? How

Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive

Not trying to barge in, just sprinkling data... On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Olli Pettay wrote: > >> On 02/02/2015 09:22 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: >> >>> Brian recently posted what looks like an excellent framing of the >>> composit

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

> On Feb 3, 2015, at 7:13 AM, Chris Bateman wrote: > > Why don't we just make all input elements support these new attributes we're > adding? > > In my opinion, I'd say because you can't possibly cover every case - what > about doing the same kind of formatting for social security numbers, cr

Re: [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404

Arthur Barstow , 2015-02-02 08:47 -0500: > Archived-At: > On 2/2/15 7:14 AM, Tobie Langel wrote: > >Heads-up that the link to the Editor's Draft of the IndexedDB spec is now > >a 404. > > Thanks for reporting this Tobie. I've asked Joshua and Mike

Re: [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote: > > Arthur Barstow , 2015-02-02 08:47 -0500: > > Archived-At: > > On 2/2/15 7:14 AM, Tobie Langel wrote: > > > > >Would recommend redirecting to the ED of the next version of the spec. > > >