[admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10

2015-02-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at Google's Mount View CA office is now open: The meeting/agenda page is: . Please register by April 1

Re: CORS performance

2015-02-24 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> If that's the case then I think we'd get most of the functionality, >> with essentially none of the risk, by only allowing server-wide >> cookie-less preflights. > > If we only do it for this, could we combine that feature with the > exi

Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning

2015-02-24 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Filed https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28092 to add more data to the informative content around the normative statement that makes this happen. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Anne van Kesteren > wrote: > >> On Tue, Fe

[Bug 28092] New: [Custom]: Clarify in informative note that cloning/importing also enqueues created callback

2015-02-24 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28092 Bug ID: 28092 Summary: [Custom]: Clarify in informative note that cloning/importing also enqueues created callback Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC

Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning

2015-02-24 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Dimitri Glazkov > wrote: > > Wait, what do you mean by "that is what custom elements provide for > today.." > > > > The entire pattern of template-stamping depends on the fact that custom > > elements ar

Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning

2015-02-24 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > Wait, what do you mean by "that is what custom elements provide for today.." > > The entire pattern of template-stamping depends on the fact that custom > elements aren't broken when cloning/importing. There's no hook for cloning, is there

Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning

2015-02-24 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > In that regard, perhaps what we need another option (although 4 might be > a developer friendly superset of this): > > 5) Don't do anything. Custom elements will be broken upon

Re: CORS performance

2015-02-24 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> That combined with requiring to list >> the explicit origin has worked well for CORS so far. > > This could potentially help. > > I don't remember the details of how/why people sc

Re: Custom elements: synchronous constructors and cloning

2015-02-24 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > In that regard, perhaps what we need another option (although 4 might be a > developer friendly superset of this): > 5) Don't do anything. Custom elements will be broken upon cloning if there > are internal states other than attributes jus