RE: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21

2015-05-14 Thread Zhang, Zhiqiang
> From: Kostiainen, Anssi [mailto:anssi.kostiai...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 21:16 > To: Arthur Barstow > Cc: public-webapps > Subject: Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21 > > > On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > > > 1. Publish a new WD

Re: Directory Upload Proposal

2015-05-14 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > One important question though is what would directories> do on platforms that don't have a directory UI concept? > Like most mobile platforms? Err.. that should say: What would do on platforms that don't have a directory UI concept? / J

Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21

2015-05-14 Thread Kostiainen, Anssi
> On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per > process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. This addresses the concern and clears the confusion around an outdated /TR. > If you have any comme

CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21

2015-05-14 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The draft WD is [2]