Oops, found that you were already there :)
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=393490#c15
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)
wrote:
> Sorry for coming late, but
>
> - crbug.com/393490 Before and After pseudo elements don't work in
> ShadowRoots (with :host st
Sorry for coming late, but
- crbug.com/393490 Before and After pseudo elements don't work in
ShadowRoots (with :host styles)
- crbug.com/393509 :host()::before or :host()::after should work
have the relevant discussion about the current implementation in Blink (#2).
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:16
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-webstorage-20150609/
> Particpate: [sic]
> the event must have its key attribute initialised to the name of the key in
> question,
`initialized` [About 11,800,000 results] should be spelled as such for
w3c specs (w3c is en-us) instead of
`initialised` [About 553,000
I'm not sure having a hub is worth the implementation pain.
It looks like there are three pretty different things here:
ImageBitmap - Immutable images for drawing on canvas. Typically
premultiplied data located on the GPU
ImageData - Mutable script accessible array of data. Unpremultiplied
data l
Arrg. It's far-less used than I thought.
It turns out that it _was_ used in production last year, but then it was
removed from production when a UI change interfered and the bug to fix it is
still open :(
So, my guess is that as of today, we have infinitesimal-small usage of this API
in IE.
-
Making ImageData the "hub" would imply more copies in memory in many cases.
Because ImageData is mutable (not to mention the alpha multiplication
issues which are also a factor), it cannot share its image buffer with the
source it was created from, unlike ImageBitmap. Immutability is a
significant
Google had offered to host the meeting, and I believe they are on it.
Obviously, offers to share the hosting effort are welcome in general. I haven't
checked but agree that based on last time 22 might be squeezing it.
cheers
02.07.2015, 09:11, "Anne van Kesteren" :
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:56
Hi,
Changes for Blink have landed and now you can play this by enabling
"experimental web platform features"
in chrome://flags.
Now I am proposing this as a patch to shadow DOM, at
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/ShadowRoot-delegatesFocus-Proposal.md
Feel free to comm
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Is Google hosting this meeting as well? Alternatively, would other browser
> vendors (e.g. Mozilla) willing to host it this time?
If we decide quickly it seems I can reserve a room at Mozilla for 18
people in SF, maybe 22 in MTV. Not sure th
In the interest of moving forward I tried to more seriously consider
Dmitry's approach. Based on es-discussion discussion
https://esdiscuss.org/topic/will-any-new-features-be-tied-to-constructors
it seems likely new JavaScript features (such as private state) will
be tied to object creation. This m
> On Jun 13, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Léonie Watson wrote:
>
> From: Bruce Lawson [mailto:bru...@opera.com]
> Sent: 13 June 2015 16:34
>
> On 13 June 2015 at 15:30, Léonie Watson wrote:
>> why not use the extends= syntax you mentioned?
>>
>> Push
>
> because browsers that don't know about web comp
11 matches
Mail list logo
